Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36839355›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Yellow Mealworm (

Anca Mihaly Cozmuta, Alexandra Uivarasan, Anca Peter, Camelia Nicula, Dalma Emoke Kovacs, Leonard Mihaly Cozmuta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Potential of Black Soldier Fly (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effect of the Addition of Yellow Mealworm (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Innovative Applications ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anca Mihaly CozmutaTechnical University of Cluj Napoca, North University Center of Baia Mare, Victoriei Str. 76, 430122 Baia Mare, Romania.
Alexandra UivarasanTechnical University of Cluj Napoca, North University Center of Baia Mare, Victoriei Str. 76, 430122 Baia Mare, Romania.
Anca PeterTechnical University of Cluj Napoca, North University Center of Baia Mare, Victoriei Str. 76, 430122 Baia Mare, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0080-7296
Camelia NiculaTechnical University of Cluj Napoca, North University Center of Baia Mare, Victoriei Str. 76, 430122 Baia Mare, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8609-4682
Dalma Emoke KovacsResearch Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, INCDO INOE 2000, Donath 63, 400293 Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Leonard Mihaly CozmutaTechnical University of Cluj Napoca, North University Center of Baia Mare, Victoriei Str. 76, 430122 Baia Mare, Romania.
Technical University of Cluj-Napoca · ROResearch Institute for Analytical Instrumentation · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional biscuits are considered products with poor nutritional value because of their large share of rapidly digested starch, which results in an elevated glycaemic index. This paper explores the improvement of the nutritional value of biscuits by adding yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) powder. Four biscuit recipes containing 0%(R1), 10%(R2), 15%(R3), and 20%(R4) of yellow mealworm powder were prepared and subjected to sensorial analysis. The R3 biscuits were selected for further investigation, as they had the highest acceptability. Compared to the reference R1, the R3 biscuits showed an improved nutritional profile in terms of protein, fat, ash, minerals, fibres, essential amino acids, and unsaturated fatty acids, and lower amounts of carbohydrates and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. The in vitro protein digestibility in R3 improved 1.12-fold compared to R1. No significant difference was found between the digestibility of the lipids released from R1 and R3. A higher fraction of slowly digestible starch was present in R3 compared to R1. The starch digestibility and estimated glycaemic index were 72.96% and 79.56% in R3, which can be compared to 78.79% and 90.14%, respectively, in R1. Due to their enhanced nutritional profile, higher bioaccessible protein fraction, and lower glycaemic index, yellow mealworm powder biscuits can be considered a more nutritious alternative to traditional biscuits.

Indexed as

Glycemic IndexTenebrioAnimalsDigestionPowdersStarchPowdersStarchfunctional biscuitsin vitro digestion modellingrapidly digestible starchslowly digestible starch

Identifiers

PMID36839355
PMCPMC9961205
OpenAlexW4321107780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.