ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023
A KNIME Workflow to Assist the Analogue Identification for Read-Across, Applied to Aromatase Activity.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hybrid Class Balancing Approach for Chemical Compound Toxicity Prediction.Current computer-aided drug design · 2025Article
- Cu (II)-catalyzed: synthesis of imidazole derivatives and evaluating their larvicidal, antimicrobial activities with DFT and molecular docking studies.BMC chemistry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The reduction and replacement of in vivo tests have become crucial in terms of resources and animal benefits. The read-across approach reduces the number of substances to be tested, exploiting existing experimental data to predict the properties of untested substances. Currently, several tools have been developed to perform read-across, but other approaches, such as computational workflows, can offer a more flexible and less prescriptive approach. In this paper, we are introducing a workflow to support analogue identification for read-across. The implementation of the workflow was performed using a database of azole chemicals with in vitro toxicity data for human aromatase enzymes. The workflow identified analogues based on three similarities: structural similarity (StrS), metabolic similarity (MtS), and mechanistic similarity (McS). Our results showed how multiple similarity metrics can be combined within a read-across assessment. The use of the similarity based on metabolism and toxicological mechanism improved the predictions in particular for sensitivity. Beyond the results predicting a large population of substances, practical examples illustrate the advantages of the proposed approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.