Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36838689›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Quantitative Structure Retention-Relationship Modeling: Towards an Innovative General-Purpose Strategy.

Priyanka Kumari, Thomas Van Laethem, Philippe Hubert, Marianne Fillet, Pierre-Yves Sacré, Cédric Hubert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Priyanka KumariDepartment of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry, University of Liège (ULiege), CIRM, Quartier Hopital (B36 Tower 4), Avenue Hippocrate, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8415-2922
Thomas Van LaethemDepartment of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry, University of Liège (ULiege), CIRM, Quartier Hopital (B36 Tower 4), Avenue Hippocrate, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9556-3521
Philippe HubertDepartment of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry, University of Liège (ULiege), CIRM, Quartier Hopital (B36 Tower 4), Avenue Hippocrate, 4000 Liège, Belgium.
Marianne FilletLaboratory for the Analysis of Medicines, University of Liège (ULiege), CIRM, Quartier Hopital (B36 Tower 4), Avenue Hippocrate, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1453-6282
Pierre-Yves SacréDepartment of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry, University of Liège (ULiege), CIRM, Quartier Hopital (B36 Tower 4), Avenue Hippocrate, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7113-758X
Cédric HubertDepartment of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry, University of Liège (ULiege), CIRM, Quartier Hopital (B36 Tower 4), Avenue Hippocrate, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9127-7106
University of Liège · BE

Funding

FWO/FNRS Belgium EOS-program 30897864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatography (RPLC) is a common liquid chromatographic mode used for the control of pharmaceutical compounds during their drug life cycle. Nevertheless, determining the optimal chromatographic conditions that enable this separation is time consuming and requires a lot of lab work. Quantitative Structure Retention Relationship models (QSRR) are helpful for doing this job with minimal time and cost expenditures by predicting retention times of known compounds without performing experiments. In the current work, several QSRR models were built and compared for their adequacy in predicting the retention times. The regression models were based on a combination of linear and non-linear algorithms such as Multiple Linear Regression, Support Vector Regression, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosted Regression. Models were built for five pH conditions, i.e., at pH 2.7, 3.5, 6.5, and 8.0. In the end, the model predictions were combined using stacking and the performances of all models were compared. The k-nearest neighbor-based application domain filter was established to assess the reliability of the prediction for further compound prioritization. Altogether, this study can be insightful for analytical chemists working with RPLC to begin with the computational prediction modeling such as QSRR to predict the separation of small molecules.

Indexed as

Chromatography, Reverse-PhaseQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipAlgorithmsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidChromatography, LiquidReproducibility of Resultsapplicability domainmachine learningQSRRRPLCstacking

Identifiers

PMID36838689
PMCPMC9964055
OpenAlexW4319971282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.