Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36838339›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2023

Effect of Tea Saponins on Rumen Microbiota and Rumen Function in Qinchuan Beef Cattle.

Xiaopeng Qu, Sayed Haidar Abbas Raza, Yanqing Zhao, Jiahan Deng, Jing Ma, Juze Wang, Nada Alkhorayef, Samia S Alkhalil, Sameer D Pant, Hongtao Lei and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Effects of water extracts ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiaopeng QuCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China.
Sayed Haidar Abbas RazaCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0961-1911
Yanqing ZhaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China.
Jiahan DengCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China.
Jing MaCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China.
Juze WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China.
Nada AlkhorayefDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Science, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Al-Quway'iyah Shaqra University, Al-Quway'iyah 13343, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9780-9305
Samia S AlkhalilDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Shaqra University, Shaqra 11961, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5811-7592
Sameer D PantGulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Boorooma Street, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2678, Australia.
Hongtao LeiSafety of Livestock and Poultry Products, College of Food Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1697-1747
Linsen ZanCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang 712100, China.
Northwest A&F University · CNShaqra University · SASouth China Agricultural University · CNCharles Sturt University · AUNational Beef Cattle Industrial Technology System · CN

Funding

Special Project for the Central Government to Guide Local Science and Technology Development (2060404-51301) National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972994), National Beef and Yak Industrial Technology System (CARS-37), Key Research and Developmen 2022NY-050, 2022ZDLNY01-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotics can promote livestock growth but have side effects, so the search for safe and effective alternatives to antibiotics is urgent. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of supplementing cattle feed with tea saponins on ruminal bacteria and fungi. Sixteen Qinchuan beef cattle with a live body weight of 250 ± 10 kg were divided into four groups (four animals in each group) using a completely randomized experimental design. Four different levels of tea saponins were provided to the Qinchuan cattle as treatments, including 0 g/cattle per day control, CON), 10 g/cattle per day (low-level, LT), 20 g/cattle per day (medium-level, MT) and 30 g/cattle per day (high-level, HT). The pre-feeding period was 10 days and the official period was 80 days in this experiment. After 90 days of feeding, the rumen fluid from sixteen Qinchuan beef cattle was collected using an oral stomach tube for evaluating changes in ruminal microbiota and rumen fermentation parameters. Results indicate that the total VFAs and proportions of propionate in the LT group was significantly higher than that in the CON and HT groups (

Indexed as

cattlefeed additivesmicroflorarumensaponins

Identifiers

PMID36838339
PMCPMC9963011
OpenAlexW4319015599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.