Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36838227›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2023

Major Soilborne Pathogens of Field Processing Tomatoes and Management Strategies.

Minxiao Ma, Paul W J Taylor, Deli Chen, Niloofar Vaghefi, Ji-Zheng He

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. An EndophyticJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biological Control of Tomato Root Rot Caused byJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Yeast to the rescue:Plant signaling & behavior · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Metabolomic Profiling of Tomato Root Exudates Induced byJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Minxiao MaSchool of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Paul W J TaylorSchool of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3076-2084
Deli ChenSchool of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Niloofar VaghefiSchool of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Ji-Zheng HeSchool of Agriculture and Food, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9169-8058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, tomato is the second most cultivated vegetable crop next to potato, preferentially grown in temperate climates. Processing tomatoes are generally produced in field conditions, in which soilborne pathogens have serious impacts on tomato yield and quality by causing diseases of the tomato root system. Major processing tomato-producing countries have documented soilborne diseases caused by a variety of pathogens including bacteria, fungi, nematodes, and oomycetes, which are of economic importance and may threaten food security. Recent field surveys in the Australian processing tomato industry showed that plant growth and yield were significantly affected by soilborne pathogens, especially

Indexed as

biocontrolfungusoomycetesoilborne pathogentomatotomato disease

Identifiers

PMID36838227
PMCPMC9958975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.