Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36838182›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2023

Research on Intelligent Identification and Grading of Nonmetallic Inclusions in Steels Based on Deep Learning.

Xiaolin Zhu, Wenhai Wan, Ling Qian, Yu Cai, Xiang Chen, Pingze Zhang, Guanxi Huang, Bo Liu, Qiang Yao, Shaoyuan Li and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiaolin ZhuCollege of Material Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China.
Wenhai WanCollege of Material Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China.
Ling QianJiangsu Product Quality Testing & Inspection Institute, Nanjing 210007, China.
Yu CaiJiangsu Changbao Precision Steel Tube Co., Ltd., Changzhou 213200, China.
Xiang ChenJiangsu Zhongxin Pipe Sci-Tec Co., Ltd., Nanjing 211100, China.
Pingze ZhangCollege of Material Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China.
Guanxi HuangJiangsu Product Quality Testing & Inspection Institute, Nanjing 210007, China.
Bo LiuJiangsu Product Quality Testing & Inspection Institute, Nanjing 210007, China.
Qiang YaoJiangsu Product Quality Testing & Inspection Institute, Nanjing 210007, China.
Shaoyuan LiCollege of Material Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China.
Zhengjun YaoCollege of Material Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China.

Funding

Science and Technology Program of Jiangsu Provincial Administration for Market Regulation KJ21125122, KJ204115, KJ2022062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-metallic inclusions are unavoidable defects in steel, and their type, quantity, size, and distribution have a great impact on the quality of steel. At present, non-metallic inclusions are mainly detected manually, which features high work intensity, low efficiency, proneness to misjudgment, and low consistency of results. In this paper, based on deep neural network algorithm, a small number of manually labeled, low-resolution metallographic images collected by optical microscopes are used as the dataset for intelligent boundary extraction, classification, and rating of non-metallic inclusions. The training datasets are cropped into those containing only a single non-metallic inclusion to reduce the interference of background information and improve the accuracy. To deal with the unbalanced distribution of each category of inclusions, the reweighting cross entropy loss and focal loss are respectively used as the category prediction loss and boundary prediction loss of the DeepLabv3+ semantic segmentation model. Finally, the length and width of the minimum enclosing rectangle of the segmented inclusions are measured to calculate the grade of inclusions. The resulting accuracy is 90.34% in segmentation and 90.35% in classification. As is verified, the model-based rating results are consistent with those of manual labeling. For a single sample, the detection time is reduced from 30 min to 15 s, significantly improving the detection efficiency.

Indexed as

deep learningintelligent ratingnon-metallic inclusionssegmentation and classification

Identifiers

PMID36838182
PMCPMC9959681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.