ArticleMicromachines2023
Research on Intelligent Identification and Grading of Nonmetallic Inclusions in Steels Based on Deep Learning.
Article in Micromachines, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sensor Array and SMOTE-Based Algorithms for Volatile-Fingerprint Classification of Pesticide-Treated Soil with a Novel Chamber.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-metallic inclusions are unavoidable defects in steel, and their type, quantity, size, and distribution have a great impact on the quality of steel. At present, non-metallic inclusions are mainly detected manually, which features high work intensity, low efficiency, proneness to misjudgment, and low consistency of results. In this paper, based on deep neural network algorithm, a small number of manually labeled, low-resolution metallographic images collected by optical microscopes are used as the dataset for intelligent boundary extraction, classification, and rating of non-metallic inclusions. The training datasets are cropped into those containing only a single non-metallic inclusion to reduce the interference of background information and improve the accuracy. To deal with the unbalanced distribution of each category of inclusions, the reweighting cross entropy loss and focal loss are respectively used as the category prediction loss and boundary prediction loss of the DeepLabv3+ semantic segmentation model. Finally, the length and width of the minimum enclosing rectangle of the segmented inclusions are measured to calculate the grade of inclusions. The resulting accuracy is 90.34% in segmentation and 90.35% in classification. As is verified, the model-based rating results are consistent with those of manual labeling. For a single sample, the detection time is reduced from 30 min to 15 s, significantly improving the detection efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.