Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36837918›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2023

Application of Machine Learning to Metabolomic Profile Characterization in Glioblastoma Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiation.

Orwa Aboud, Yin Allison Liu, Oliver Fiehn, Christopher Brydges, Ruben Fragoso, Han Sung Lee, Jonathan Riess, Rawad Hodeify, Orin Bloch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Orwa AboudDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7916-1629
Yin Allison LiuDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Oliver FiehnWest Coast Metabolomics Center, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95817, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6261-8928
Christopher BrydgesWest Coast Metabolomics Center, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95817, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5901-638X
Ruben FragosoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Han Sung LeeDepartment of Pathology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Jonathan RiessComprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Rawad HodeifyDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Arts and Sciences, American University of Ras Al Khaimah, Ras Al Khaimah 72603, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-1016-2287
Orin BlochDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
University of California, Davis · USNeurological Surgery · USAmerican University of Ras Al Khaimah · AE

Funding

UC Davis Paul Calabresi K12 Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA138464 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BIRKELAND, ANDREW CHARLES, LARA, PRIMO N. · 2011 to 2025
$11.4M
West Coast Metabolomics Center for Compound IdentificationU2CES030158 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FIEHN, OLIVER · 2018 to 2021
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA138464NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES030158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We here characterize changes in metabolite patterns in glioblastoma patients undergoing surgery and concurrent chemoradiation using machine learning (ML) algorithms to characterize metabolic changes during different stages of the treatment protocol. We examined 105 plasma specimens (before surgery, 2 days after surgical resection, before starting concurrent chemoradiation, and immediately after chemoradiation) from 36 patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype glioblastoma. Untargeted GC-TOF mass spectrometry-based metabolomics was used given its superiority in identifying and quantitating small metabolites; this yielded 157 structurally identified metabolites. Using Multinomial Logistic Regression (MLR) and GradientBoostingClassifier (GB Classifier), ML models classified specimens based on metabolic changes. The classification performance of these models was evaluated using performance metrics and area under the curve (AUC) scores. Comparing post-radiation to pre-radiation showed increased levels of 15 metabolites: glycine, serine, threonine, oxoproline, 6-deoxyglucose, gluconic acid, glycerol-alpha-phosphate, ethanolamine, propyleneglycol, triethanolamine, xylitol, succinic acid, arachidonic acid, linoleic acid, and fumaric acid. After chemoradiation, a significant decrease was detected in 3-aminopiperidine 2,6-dione. An MLR classification of the treatment phases was performed with 78% accuracy and 75% precision (AUC = 0.89). The alternative GB Classifier algorithm achieved 75% accuracy and 77% precision (AUC = 0.91). Finally, we investigated specific patterns for metabolite changes in highly correlated metabolites. We identified metabolites with characteristic changing patterns between pre-surgery and post-surgery and post-radiation samples. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to describe blood metabolic signatures using ML algorithms during different treatment phases in patients with glioblastoma. A larger study is needed to validate the results and the potential application of this algorithm for the characterization of treatment responses.

Indexed as

concurrent chemoradiationglioblastomamachine learningmetabolomic profilingtreatment response

Identifiers

PMID36837918
PMCPMC9961856
OpenAlexW4321374024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.