Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36837896›Full record

ReviewMetabolites2023

Lúcio Ricardo Leite Diniz, Leonardo Luiz Calado, Allana Brunna Sucupira Duarte, Damião Pergentino de Sousa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolites, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Modular reconstruction and multilevel regulation ofSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  17. Asiatic Acid AttenuatesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lúcio Ricardo Leite DinizNational Institute of the Semiarid, Campina Grande 58434-700, Paraíba, Brazil.
Leonardo Luiz CaladoNational Institute of the Semiarid, Campina Grande 58434-700, Paraíba, Brazil.
Allana Brunna Sucupira DuarteDepartament of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa 58051-970, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6192-3691
Damião Pergentino de SousaDepartament of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa 58051-970, Paraíba, Brazil.

Funding

Brazilian agencies National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) 306729/2019-9Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) PROEX TERMO AUXPE 0521/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An intense effort has been focused on new therapeutic approaches and the development of technologies for more efficient and rapid wound healing. The research for plants used for long time in traditional medicine in the treatment of wound has become a promising strategy to obtain drugs therapeutically useful in the acute and chronic wound management. In this context,

Indexed as

anti-inflammatory activityantimicrobial actionApiaceaecicatrizationmedicinal plantnatural productsphytotherapyscarterpene

Identifiers

PMID36837896
PMCPMC9966672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.