Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36837891›Full record

ReviewMetabolites2023

An Overview of Analytical Methods for Quantitative Determination of Coenzyme Q10 in Foods.

Andersina Simina Podar, Cristina Anamaria Semeniuc, Simona Raluca Ionescu, Maria-Ioana Socaciu, Melinda Fogarasi, Anca Corina Fărcaș, Dan Cristian Vodnar, Sonia Ancuța Socaci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Metabolites, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andersina Simina PodarDepartment of Food Science, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Mănăştur St., 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Cristina Anamaria SemeniucCentre for Technology Transfer-BioTech, 64 Calea Florești, 400509 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9721-4560
Simona Raluca IonescuCentre for Technology Transfer-BioTech, 64 Calea Florești, 400509 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Maria-Ioana SocaciuCentre for Technology Transfer-BioTech, 64 Calea Florești, 400509 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8871-1995
Melinda FogarasiCentre for Technology Transfer-BioTech, 64 Calea Florești, 400509 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9561-1183
Anca Corina FărcașDepartment of Food Science, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Mănăştur St., 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1392-4080
Dan Cristian VodnarDepartment of Food Science, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Mănăştur St., 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5407-8071
Sonia Ancuța SocaciDepartment of Food Science, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca, 3-5 Mănăştur St., 400372 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0594-4628

Funding

The Romanian Ministry of Education and Research, CNCS-UEFISCDI PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2020-1847, within PNCDI III
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food analysts have developed three primary techniques for coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) production: isolation from animal or plant matrices, chemical synthesis, and microbial fermentation; this literature review is focused on the first method. Choosing the appropriate analytical method for determining CoQ10 in a particular food product is essential, as this analyte is a quality index for healthy foods; various associations of extraction and quantification techniques are available in the literature, each having advantages and disadvantages. Several factors must be considered when selecting an analytical method, such as specificity, linear range, detection limit, quantification limit, recovery rate, operation size, analysis time, equipment availability, and costs. In another train of thought, the food sector produces a significant amount of solid and liquid waste; therefore, waste-considered materials can be a valuable source of CoQ10 that can be recovered and used as a fortifying ingredient or dietary supplement. This review also pursues identifying the richest food sources of CoQ10, and has revealed them to be vegetable oils, fish oil, organs, and meat.

Indexed as

coenzyme Q10extractionfoodsquantificationrecoverywastes

Identifiers

PMID36837891
PMCPMC9964353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.