Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36837822›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2023

Non-Invasive Lung Cancer Diagnostics through Metabolites in Exhaled Breath: Influence of the Disease Variability and Comorbidities.

Azamat Z Temerdashev, Elina M Gashimova, Vladimir A Porkhanov, Igor S Polyakov, Dmitry V Perunov, Ekaterina V Dmitrieva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Harnessing breath biomarkers for pneumonia diagnosis and prognosis.Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Azamat Z TemerdashevDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Kuban State University, Stavropol'skaya St. 149, Krasnodar 350040, Russia.
Elina M GashimovaDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Kuban State University, Stavropol'skaya St. 149, Krasnodar 350040, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9618-7580
Vladimir A PorkhanovResearch Institute-Regional Clinical Hospital N° 1 n.a. Prof. S.V. Ochapovsky, 1 May St. 167, Krasnodar 350086, Russia.
Igor S PolyakovResearch Institute-Regional Clinical Hospital N° 1 n.a. Prof. S.V. Ochapovsky, 1 May St. 167, Krasnodar 350086, Russia.
Dmitry V PerunovResearch Institute-Regional Clinical Hospital N° 1 n.a. Prof. S.V. Ochapovsky, 1 May St. 167, Krasnodar 350086, Russia.
Ekaterina V DmitrievaDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Kuban State University, Stavropol'skaya St. 149, Krasnodar 350040, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5381-3748
Kuban State University · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 22-13-20018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive, simple, and fast tests for lung cancer diagnostics are one of the urgent needs for clinical practice. The work describes the results of exhaled breath analysis of 112 lung cancer patients and 120 healthy individuals using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Volatile organic compound (VOC) peak areas and their ratios were considered for data analysis. VOC profiles of patients with various histological types, tumor localization, TNM stage, and treatment status were considered. The effect of non-pulmonary comorbidities (chronic heart failure, hypertension, anemia, acute cerebrovascular accident, obesity, diabetes) on exhaled breath composition of lung cancer patients was studied for the first time. Significant correlations between some VOC peak areas and their ratios and these factors were found. Diagnostic models were created using gradient boosted decision trees (GBDT) and artificial neural network (ANN). The performance of developed models was compared. ANN model was the most accurate: 82-88% sensitivity and 80-86% specificity on the test data.

Indexed as

comorbiditiesexhaled breathGC-MSlung cancerthermal desorptionvolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID36837822
PMCPMC9960124
OpenAlexW4318480891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.