ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023
In Vitro Investigation of the Fixation Performance of a Bioabsorbable Magnesium ACL Interference Screw Compared to a Conventional Interference Screw.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Research progress on the role and mechanism of magnesium element and magnesium materials in tendon-bone interface healing].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Review
- Highly bio-adapted hydrogels for tendon-bone interface regeneration: Natural healing inspiration, design strategies, and biomedical potential.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- A Structural Optimization Framework for Biodegradable Magnesium Interference Screws.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Mechanical properties of a bioabsorbable magnesium interference screw for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in various testing bone materials.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a common treatment for patients with ACL rupture that aims to regain pre-injury knee stability and kinematics. During the ACL reconstruction, one method to fix the graft is the use of an interference screw (IS). The IS should provide initial stability and secure the graft during the healing period. In recent years, magnesium has emerged as an alternative material to permanent metal and polymer ISs. In addition, differences in designs, such as the shape of the IS, can influence the fixation performance of the IS. Therefore, in this biomechanical experiment, two different screw designs with two ligament materials were compared in an insertion and a pull-out test at a rate of 1 mm/s. The screw designs were a conventional polymer screw and a magnesium screw. Porcine tendon and nylon rope were used as ligament materials. All tests were performed in polyurethane foam blocks with 15 PCF density (Synbone AG, Switzerland). As a result, both screw designs required an insertion torque of less than 3 Nm. There was a significant difference between the porcine and nylon rope in pull-out tests for each screw design. The magnesium screw had the highest pull-out force at 412.14 ± 50.00 N for porcine tendon and 707.38 ± 21.81 N for nylon rope. There were no significant differences in tunnel widening (narrow-wide ratio) between each ligament material. The magnesium screw showed the lowest narrow-wide tunnel ratio, implying a better ability to compress the graft to the tunnel. In conclusion, a more optimized magnesium IS design resulted in better graft fixation and an improved ACL reconstruction outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.