ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Assessment of Intra-Abdominal Pressure with a Novel Continuous Bladder Pressure Monitor-A Clinical Validation Study.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sensing in Urinary Catheter Systems: From Measurands and Signal Fidelity to Supportable Clinical Claims.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Mechanomedicine in digestive surgery: a theranostic framework integrating mechanical diagnostics and therapeutic modulation across the perioperative continuum.Theranostics · 2026Review
- Variation and accuracy of intra-abdominal pressure measurement in different body positions: a prospective study.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Article
- International cross-sectional survey on current and updated definitions of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2024Article
- An Introduction to Ventra: A Programmable Abdominal Phantom for Training, Educational, Research, and Development Purposes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Validation of continuous intraabdominal pressure measurement: feasibility and accuracy assessment using a capsular device in in-vivo studies.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2024Article
- The development, feasibility and credibility of intra-abdominal pressure measurement techniques: A scoping review.PloS one · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the TraumaGuard Balloon-in-Balloon Catheter Design for Intra-Abdominal Pressure Monitoring: Insights from Pig and Human Cadaver Studies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- In Vitro Validation of a Novel Continuous Intra-Abdominal Pressure Measurement System (TraumaGuard).Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntra-abdominal hypertension and the resulting abdominal compartment syndrome are serious complications of severely ill patients. Diagnosis requires an intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement, which is currently cumbersome and underused. We aimed to test the accuracy of a novel continuous IAP monitor.
methodsAdults having laparoscopic surgery and requiring urinary catheter intra-operatively were recruited to this single-arm validation study. IAP measurements using the novel monitor and a gold-standard foley manometer were compared. After anesthesia induction, a pneumoperitoneum was induced through a laparoscopic insufflator, and five randomly pre-defined pressures (between 5 and 25 mmHg) were achieved and simultaneously measured via both methods in each participant. Measurements were compared using Bland-Altman analysis.
resultsIn total, 29 participants completed the study and provided 144 distinct pairs of pressure measurements that were analyzed. A positive correlation between the two methods was found (R
conclusionsContinuous IAP measurements using the novel monitor performed well in the clinical setup of controlled intra-abdominal hypertension across the evaluated range of pressures. Further studies should expand the range to more pathological values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.