Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36836720›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Remote Psychotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study on the Changes Experienced by Austrian Psychotherapists.

Michael Stadler, Andrea Jesser, Elke Humer, Barbara Haid, Peter Stippl, Wolfgang Schimböck, Elisabeth Maaß, Helmut Schwanzar, Daniela Leithner, Christoph Pieh and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael StadlerDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.
Andrea JesserDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0872-1131
Elke HumerDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9776-0353
Barbara HaidAustrian Federal Association for Psychotherapy, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Peter StipplAustrian Federal Association for Psychotherapy, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang SchimböckAustrian Federal Association for Psychotherapy, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Elisabeth MaaßÖsterreichische Gesellschaft Für Wissenschaftliche, Klientenzentrierte Psychotherapie und Personorientierte Gesprächsführung (ÖGWG), 4020 Linz, Austria.
Helmut SchwanzarÖsterreichische Gesellschaft Für Wissenschaftliche, Klientenzentrierte Psychotherapie und Personorientierte Gesprächsführung (ÖGWG), 4020 Linz, Austria.
Daniela LeithnerÖsterreichische Gesellschaft Für Wissenschaftliche, Klientenzentrierte Psychotherapie und Personorientierte Gesprächsführung (ÖGWG), 4020 Linz, Austria.
Christoph PiehDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2708-303X
Thomas ProbstDepartment for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University for Continuing Education Krems, 3500 Krems, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6113-2133
Universität für Weiterbildung Krems · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and associated measures to contain the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus required a change in treatment format from face-to-face to remote psychotherapy. This study investigated the changes experienced by Austrian therapists when switching to psychotherapy at a distance. A total of 217 therapists participated in an online survey on changes experienced when switching settings. The survey was open from 26 June until 3 September 2020. Several open questions were evaluated using qualitative content analysis. The results show that the setting at a distance was appreciated by the therapists as a possibility to continue therapy even during an exceptional situation. Moreover, remote therapy offered the respondents more flexibility in terms of space and time. Nevertheless, the therapists also reported challenges of remote therapy, such as limited sensory perceptions, technical problems and signs of fatigue. They also described differences in terms of the therapeutic interventions used. There was a great deal of ambivalence in the data regarding the intensity of sessions and the establishment and/or maintenance of a psychotherapeutic relationship. Overall, the study shows that remote psychotherapy seems to have been well accepted by Austrian psychotherapists in many settings and can offer benefits. Clinical studies are also necessary to investigate in which contexts and for which patient groups the remote setting is suitable and where it is potentially contraindicated.

Indexed as

COVID-19e-mental-healthmixed-methods psychotherapy researchpandemicpsychotherapypsychotherapy via telephonepsychotherapy via videoconferencingqualitative psychotherapy researchremote psychotherapytele-health

Identifiers

PMID36836720
PMCPMC9961677
OpenAlexW4318480385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.