Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36836705›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Multiple Brain Tumor Classification with Dense CNN Architecture Using Brain MRI Images.

Osman Özkaraca, Okan İhsan Bağrıaçık, Hüseyin Gürüler, Faheem Khan, Jamil Hussain, Jawad Khan, Umm E Laila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Osman ÖzkaracaDepartment of Information Systems Engineering, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla 48000, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0964-8757
Okan İhsan BağrıaçıkDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla 48000, Turkey.
Hüseyin GürülerDepartment of Information Systems Engineering, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla 48000, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1855-1882
Faheem KhanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si 13120, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6220-0225
Jamil HussainDaeyang AI Center, Department of Data Science, College of Software & Convergence Technology, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3862-8787
Jawad KhanDepartment of Robotics, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8263-7213
Umm E LailaDepartment of Computer Engineering, Sir Syed University of Engineering & Technology, Karachi 75300, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8050-5081

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain MR images are the most suitable method for detecting chronic nerve diseases such as brain tumors, strokes, dementia, and multiple sclerosis. They are also used as the most sensitive method in evaluating diseases of the pituitary gland, brain vessels, eye, and inner ear organs. Many medical image analysis methods based on deep learning techniques have been proposed for health monitoring and diagnosis from brain MRI images. CNNs (Convolutional Neural Networks) are a sub-branch of deep learning and are often used to analyze visual information. Common uses include image and video recognition, suggestive systems, image classification, medical image analysis, and natural language processing. In this study, a new modular deep learning model was created to retain the existing advantages of known transfer learning methods (DenseNet, VGG16, and basic CNN architectures) in the classification process of MR images and eliminate their disadvantages. Open-source brain tumor images taken from the Kaggle database were used. For the training of the model, two types of splitting were utilized. First, 80% of the MRI image dataset was used in the training phase and 20% in the testing phase. Secondly, 10-fold cross-validation was used. When the proposed deep learning model and other known transfer learning methods were tested on the same MRI dataset, an improvement in classification performance was obtained, but an increase in processing time was observed.

Indexed as

brain tumor MRI imagesCNNdeep learninghealthcareimage processing

Identifiers

PMID36836705
PMCPMC9964555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.