Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36836676›Full record

ReviewLife (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Incoherent Neutron Scattering and Terahertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy on Protein and Hydration Water.

Hiroshi Nakagawa, Naoki Yamamoto

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroshi NakagawaMaterials Sciences Research Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai-mura 319-1195, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3024-9136
Naoki YamamotoDivision of Biophysics, Department of Physiology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke 329-0498, Tochigi, Japan.
Japan Atomic Energy Agency · JPJichi Medical University · JP

Funding

MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI JP20H02944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incoherent inelastic and quasi-elastic neutron scattering (INS) and terahertz time-domain spectroscopy (THz-TDS) are spectroscopy methods that directly detect molecular dynamics, with an overlap in the measured energy regions of each method. Due to the different characteristics of their probes (i.e., neutron and light), the information obtained and the sample conditions suitable for each method differ. In this review, we introduce the differences in the quantum beam properties of the two methods and their associated advantages and disadvantages in molecular spectroscopy. Neutrons are scattered via interaction with nuclei; one characteristic of neutron scattering is a large incoherent scattering cross-section of a hydrogen atom. INS records the auto-correlation functions of atomic positions. By using the difference in neutron scattering cross-sections of isotopes in multi-component systems, some molecules can be selectively observed. In contrast, THz-TDS observes the cross-correlation function of dipole moments. In water-containing biomolecular samples, the absorption of water molecules is particularly large. While INS requires large-scale experimental facilities, such as accelerators and nuclear reactors, THz-TDS can be performed at the laboratory level. In the analysis of water molecule dynamics, INS is primarily sensitive to translational diffusion motion, while THz-TDS observes rotational motion in the spectrum. The two techniques are complementary in many respects, and a combination of the two is very useful in analyzing the dynamics of biomolecules and hydration water.

Indexed as

correlation functionhydration water dynamicsincoherent neutron scatteringprotein dynamicsterahertz time-domain spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID36836676
PMCPMC9961865
OpenAlexW4317743463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.