Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36836602›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023

Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Posterior Decompression (OLIF-PD) and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF) in the Treatment of Adjacent Segmental Disease(ASD).

Bin Zhang, Yuan Hu, Qingquan Kong, Pin Feng, Junlin Liu, Junsong Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bin ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People's Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region, Chengdu 610041, China.
Yuan HuDepartment of Orthopedics Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People's Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region, Chengdu 610041, China.
Qingquan KongDepartment of Orthopedics Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Pin FengDepartment of Orthopedics Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People's Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region, Chengdu 610041, China.
Junlin LiuDepartment of Orthopedics Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People's Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region, Chengdu 610041, China.
Junsong MaDepartment of Orthopedics Surgery, Hospital of Chengdu Office of People's Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region, Chengdu 610041, China.
Tibet Autonomous Region People's Hospital · CNSichuan University · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Tibet Autonomous Region XZ202101ZR0047G
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn unintended consequence following lumbar fusion is the development of adjacent segment disease (ASD). Oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior decompression (OLIF-PD) is another feasible option for ASD, and there is no literature report on this combined surgical strategy.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 18 ASD patients requiring direct decompression in our hospital between September 2017 and January 2022. Among them, eight patients underwent OLIF-PD revision and ten underwent PLIF revision. There were no significant differences in the baseline data between the two groups. The clinical outcomes and complications were compared between the two groups.

resultsThe operation time, operative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay in the OLIF-PD group were significantly lower than those in the PLIF group. The VAS of low back pain in the OLIF-PD group was significantly better than that in the PLIF group during the postoperative follow-up. The ODI at the last follow-up in the OLIF-PD group and the PLIF group were significantly relieved compared with those before operation. The excellent and good rate of the modified MacNab standard at the last follow-up was 87.5% in the OLIF-PD group and 70% in the PLIF group. There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups.

conclusionFor ASD requiring direct decompression after posterior lumbar fusion, compared with traditional PLIF revision surgery, OLIF-PD has a similar clinical effect, but has a reduced operation time, blood loss, hospital stay and complications. OLIF-PD may be an alternative revision strategy for ASD.

Indexed as

adjacent segment diseaselumbar spinal stenosisoblique lumbar interbody fusionposterior decompressionposterior lumbar interbody fusion

Identifiers

PMID36836602
PMCPMC9966658
OpenAlexW4321373649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.