Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36836527›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2023

Management of Vascular Access in the Setting of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support (pMCS): Sheaths, Vascular Access and Closure Systems.

Andrea Sardone, Luca Franchin, Diego Moniaci, Salvatore Colangelo, Francesco Colombo, Giacomo Boccuzzi, Mario Iannaccone

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea SardoneDivision of Cardiology, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, 10100 Turin, Italy.
Luca FranchinDivision of Cardiology, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, 10100 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6221-482X
Diego MoniaciDivision of Vascular Surgery, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, 10100 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4324-6126
Salvatore ColangeloDivision of Cardiology, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, 10100 Turin, Italy.
Francesco ColomboDivision of Cardiology, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, 10100 Turin, Italy.
Giacomo BoccuzziDivision of Cardiology, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, 10100 Turin, Italy.
Mario IannacconeDivision of Cardiology, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, 10100 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0571-3918
Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS), such as intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, TandemHeart and VA-ECMO, in the setting of cardiogenic shock or in protect percutaneous coronary intervention (protect-PCI) is rapidly increasing in clinical practice. The major problem related to the use of pMCS is the management of all the device-related complications and of any vascular injury. MCS often requires large-bore access, if compared with common PCI, and for this reason the correct management of vascular access is a crucial point. The correct use of these devices in catheterization laboratories requires specific knowledge such as the correct evaluation of the vascular access performed, when possible, with advance imaging techniques in order to choose a percutaneous or a surgical approach. In addition to conventional transfemoral access, other types of access, such as transaxillary/subclavial access and the transcaval approach, have emerged over the years. These other approaches require advanced skills of the operators and a multidisciplinary team with dedicated physicians. Another important part of the management of vascular access is the closure systems used for hemostasis. Currently, two types of devices are typically used in the lab: suture-based or plug-based ones. In this review we want to describe all these aspects related to the management of vascular access in pMCS and describe, finally, a case report from our center's experience.

Indexed as

cardiogenic shockmechanical circulatory supportprotect-PCIvascular management

Identifiers

PMID36836527
PMCPMC9960206
OpenAlexW4319316116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.