Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36836511›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023

A Prospective Study of Longitudinal Risks of Cognitive Deficit for People Undergoing Glioblastoma Surgery Using a Tablet Computer Cognition Testing Battery: Towards Personalized Understanding of Risks to Cognitive Function.

Rohitashwa Sinha, Riccardo Masina, Cristina Morales, Katherine Burton, Yizhou Wan, Alexis Joannides, Richard J Mair, Robert C Morris, Thomas Santarius, Tom Manly and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Mapping Cognitive Oncology: A Decade of Trends and Research Fronts.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Precision Surgery for Glioblastomas.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rohitashwa SinhaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Riccardo MasinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Cristina MoralesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Katherine BurtonDepartment of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Yizhou WanDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Alexis JoannidesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Richard J MairDepartment of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Robert C MorrisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Thomas SantariusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Tom ManlyMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK.
Stephen J PriceDepartment of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7535-3009
Addenbrooke's Hospital · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma and the surgery to remove it pose high risks to the cognitive function of patients. Little reliable data exist about these risks, especially postoperatively before radiotherapy. We hypothesized that cognitive deficit risks detected before surgery will be exacerbated by surgery in patients with glioblastoma undergoing maximal treatment regimens. We used longitudinal electronic cognitive testing perioperatively to perform a prospective, longitudinal, observational study of 49 participants with glioblastoma undergoing surgery. Before surgery (A1), the participant risk of deficit in 5/6 cognitive domains was increased compared to normative data. Of these, the risks to Attention (OR = 31.19), Memory (OR = 97.38), and Perception (OR = 213.75) were markedly increased. These risks significantly increased in the early period after surgery (A2) when patients were discharged home or seen in the clinic to discuss histology results. For participants tested at 4-6 weeks after surgery (A3) before starting radiotherapy, there was evidence of risk reduction towards A1. The observed risks of cognitive deficit were independent of patient-specific, tumour-specific, and surgery-specific co-variates. These results reveal a timeframe of natural recovery in the first 4-6 weeks after surgery based on personalized deficit profiles for each participant. Future research in this period could investigate personalized rehabilitation tools to aid the recovery process found.

Indexed as

cognitiondeficitsglioblastomaneuro-oncologyquality of liferiskssurgerysurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID36836511
PMCPMC9967594
OpenAlexW4318832136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.