Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36836439›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery.

Jeong-Min Kim, Seon-Mi Lee, Aeran Seol, Jae-Yun Song, Ki-Jin Ryu, Sanghoon Lee, Hyun-Tae Park, Hyun-Woong Cho, Kyung-Jin Min, Jin-Hwa Hong and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeong-Min KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Koreadae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Seon-Mi LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Koreadae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2388-0111
Aeran SeolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Koreadae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Yun SongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Koreadae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Ki-Jin RyuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Koreadae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3013-8284
Sanghoon LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Koreadae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5546-0763
Hyun-Tae ParkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Koreadae-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Woong ChoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul 08308, Republic of Korea.
Kyung-Jin MinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 123 Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si 15355, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5783-4968
Jin-Hwa HongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul 08308, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Kwan LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-gu, Seoul 08308, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3101-6403
Nak-Woo LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 123 Jeokgeum-ro, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si 15355, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Korea University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to compare the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) and single-port robotic surgery (SPRS).

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent a hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, or myomectomy with SPLS or SPRS from January 2020 to July 2022. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS chi-square test and student's

resultsA total of 566 surgeries including single-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPLH;

conclusionsOur study demonstrated that the SPRS had comparable surgical outcomes when compared to the SPLS. Therefore, the SPRS should be considered a feasible and safe option for gynecologic patients.

Indexed as

minimally invasive surgerysingle-port laparoscopic surgerysingle-port robotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID36836439
PMCPMC9961794
OpenAlexW4318044156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.