Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36836426›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2023

Learning Curve of Robotic Lobectomy for the Treatment of Lung Cancer: How Does It Impact on the Autonomic Nervous System of the Surgeon?

Antonio Mazzella, Shehab Mohamed, Patrick Maisonneuve, Giulia Sedda, Andrea Cara, Monica Casiraghi, Francesco Petrella, Stefano Maria Donghi, Giorgio Lo Iacono, Lorenzo Spaggiari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antonio MazzellaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5330-5495
Shehab MohamedDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3157-3720
Patrick MaisonneuveDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5309-4704
Giulia SeddaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7482-1544
Andrea CaraDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Monica CasiraghiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5986-7811
Francesco PetrellaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5945-1576
Stefano Maria DonghiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
Giorgio Lo IaconoDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2629-7781
Lorenzo SpaggiariDivision of Thoracic Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
European Institute of Oncology · ITUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur purpose is to define the learning curve for robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy by reporting the experience of a single surgeon. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe progressively collected the data concerning the surgical performance of a single male thoracic surgeon, from the beginning of his robotic activity as first operator from January 2021 to June 2022. We evaluated several pre-, intra- and postoperative parameters concerning patients and intraoperative cardiovascular and respiratory outcomes of the surgeon, recorded during surgical interventions, in order to evaluate his cardiovascular stress. We used cumulative sum control charts (CUSUM) to analyze the learning curve.

resultsA total of 72 lung lobectomies were performed by a single surgeon in this period. Analyzing the CUSUM of several parameters, the inflection point identifying the transition beyond the surgeon learning phase was reached at cases 28, 22, 27 and 33 when considering operating time, mean heart rate, max heart rate and mean respiratory rate, respectively.

conclusionsThe learning curve for robotic lobectomy seems to be safe and feasible with a correct robotic training program. The analysis of a single surgeon from the beginning of his robotic activity demonstrates that confidence, competence, dexterity and security are achieved after about 20-30 procedures, without compromising efficiency and oncological radicality.

Indexed as

learning curvelobectomylung cancerRATSrobotic-assisted surgeryrobotic surgerysurgical stressthoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID36836426
PMCPMC9961561
OpenAlexW4317734429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.