Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36836164›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Long-Term Use of Insomnia Medications: An Appraisal of the Current Clinical and Scientific Evidence.

Phyllis C Zee, Suzanne M Bertisch, Charles M Morin, Rafael Pelayo, Nathaniel F Watson, John W Winkelman, Andrew D Krystal

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Short-term sleep benefitsFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. The effect of acupuncture on hot flashes and sleep disturbances in women with breast cancer receiving endocrine therapy: a pre-post quasi-interventional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Phyllis C ZeeDepartment of Neurology, Center for Circadian and Sleep Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6296-6685
Suzanne M BertischDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4627-8871
Charles M MorinDepartment of Psychology, Cervo Brain Research Centre, Laval University, Québec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Rafael PelayoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Sleep Medicine Center, Redwood City, CA 94305, USA.
Nathaniel F WatsonDepartment of Neurology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4870-080X
John W WinkelmanDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Andrew D KrystalDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurology, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNeurosciences Institute · USNorthwestern University · USStanford Medicine · USUniversité Laval · CAUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While evidence supports the benefits of medications for the treatment of chronic insomnia, there is ongoing debate regarding their appropriate duration of use. A panel of sleep experts conducted a clinical appraisal regarding the use of insomnia medications, as it relates to the evidence supporting the focus statement, "No insomnia medication should be used on a daily basis for durations longer than 3 weeks at a time". The panelists' assessment was also compared to findings from a national survey of practicing physicians, psychiatrists, and sleep specialists. Survey respondents revealed a wide range of opinions regarding the appropriateness of using the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications for the treatment of insomnia lasting more than 3 weeks. After discussion of the literature, the panel unanimously agreed that some classes of insomnia medications, such as non-benzodiazepines hypnotics, have been shown to be effective and safe for long-term use in the appropriate clinical setting. For eszopiclone, doxepin, ramelteon and the newer class of dual orexin receptor antagonists, the FDA label does not specify that their use should be of a limited duration. Thus, an evaluation of evidence supporting the long-term safety and efficacy of newer non-benzodiazepine hypnotics is timely and should be considered in practice recommendations for the duration of pharmacologic treatment of chronic insomnia.

Indexed as

clinical appraisalinsomniainsomnia medicationslong-term usesafety

Identifiers

PMID36836164
PMCPMC9959182
OpenAlexW4321377515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.