Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36836093›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Combined Modality Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: How (Should) We Do It? A Narrative Review.

Artur Lemiński, Wojciech Michalski, Bartłomiej Masojć, Krystian Kaczmarek, Bartosz Małkiewicz, Jakub Kienitz, Barbara Zawisza-Lemińska, Michał Falco, Marcin Słojewski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Artur LemińskiDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1446-2970
Wojciech MichalskiDepartment of Urological Cancer, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology (MSCNRIO), Roentgena 5, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland.
Bartłomiej MasojćDepartment of Radiotherapy, West-Pomeranian Oncology Center, 71-730 Szczecin, Poland.
Krystian KaczmarekDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4898-960X
Bartosz MałkiewiczDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5933-3753
Jakub KienitzDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.
Barbara Zawisza-LemińskaDepartment of Rehabilitation, West-Pomeranian Oncology Center, 71-730 Szczecin, Poland.
Michał FalcoDepartment of Radiotherapy, West-Pomeranian Oncology Center, 71-730 Szczecin, Poland.
Marcin SłojewskiDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3679-7325
Pomeranian Medical University · PLThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organ-sparing combined-modality treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer remains underutilized despite high-quality evidence regarding its efficacy, safety, and preservation of quality of life. It may be offered to patients unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy, as well as those unfit for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. The treatment plan should be tailored to each patient's characteristics, with more intensive protocols offered to patients who are fit for surgery but opt for organ-sparing. After a thorough, debulking transurethral resection of the tumor and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the response evaluation should trigger further management with either chemoradiation or early cystectomy in non-responders. A hypofractionated, continuous radiotherapy regimen of 55 Gy in 20 fractions with concurrent radiosensitizing chemotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, or 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C is currently preferred based on clinical trials. The response should be evaluated with repeated transurethral resections of the tumor bed and abdominopelvic-computed tomography after chemoradiation, with quarterly assessments during the first year. Salvage cystectomy should be offered to patients fit for surgery who failed to respond to treatment or developed a muscle-invasive recurrence. Non-muscle-invasive bladder recurrences and upper tract tumors should be treated in line with guidelines for respective primary tumors. Multiparametric magnetic resonance can be used for tumor staging and response monitoring, as it may distinguish disease recurrence from treatment-induced inflammation and fibrosis.

Indexed as

bladder-sparing treatmentmuscle-invasive bladder cancerneoadjuvant chemotherapyradical cystectomyradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36836093
PMCPMC9960746
OpenAlexW4321094926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.