Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36836024›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

Post-Surgical Imaging Assessment in Rectal Cancer: Normal Findings and Complications.

Federica De Muzio, Roberta Fusco, Carmen Cutolo, Giuliana Giacobbe, Federico Bruno, Pierpaolo Palumbo, Ginevra Danti, Giulia Grazzini, Federica Flammia, Alessandra Borgheresi and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Federica De MuzioDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Roberta FuscoMedical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Naples, Italy.
Carmen CutoloDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84084 Salerno, Italy.
Giuliana GiacobbeDivision of Radiology, AORN Cardarelli, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Federico BrunoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1444-2585
Pierpaolo PalumboDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Area of Cardiovascular and Interventional Imaging, Abruzzo Health Unit 1, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1514-0092
Ginevra DantiItalian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via Della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7109-8119
Giulia GrazziniItalian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via Della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Federica FlammiaItalian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via Della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Alessandra BorgheresiDepartment of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5544-9468
Andrea AgostiniDepartment of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Francesca GrassiDivision of Radiology, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80138 Naples, Italy.
Andrea GiovagnoniDepartment of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126 Ancona, Italy.
Vittorio MieleItalian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM), SIRM Foundation, Via Della Signora 2, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7848-1567
Antonio BarileDepartment of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0253-3583
Vincenza GranataDivision of Radiology, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli", 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-3221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectal cancer (RC) is one of the deadliest malignancies worldwide. Surgery is the most common treatment for RC, performed in 63.2% of patients. The type of surgical approach chosen aims to achieve maximum residual function with the lowest risk of recurrence. The selection is made by a multidisciplinary team that assesses the characteristics of the patient and the tumor. Total mesorectal excision (TME), including both low anterior resection (LAR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR), is still the standard of care for RC. Radical surgery is burdened by a 31% rate of major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 3-4), such as anastomotic leaks and a risk of a permanent stoma. In recent years, less-invasive techniques, such as local excision, have been tested. These additional procedures could mitigate the morbidity of rectal resection, while providing acceptable oncologic results. The "watch and wait" approach is not a globally accepted model of care but encouraging results on selected groups of patients make it a promising strategy. In this plethora of treatments, the radiologist is called upon to distinguish a physiological from a pathological postoperative finding. The aim of this narrative review is to identify the main post-surgical complications and the most effective imaging techniques.

Indexed as

normal findings and complicationsrectal cancersurgery

Identifiers

PMID36836024
PMCPMC9966470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.