Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36836017›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2023

The Polish Society of Gynecological Oncology Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometrial Carcinoma (2023).

Jacek J Sznurkowski, Janusz Rys, Artur Kowalik, Agnieszka Zolciak-Siwinska, Lubomir Bodnar, Anita Chudecka-Glaz, Pawel Blecharz, Aleksandra Zielinska, Andrzej Marszalek, Mariusz Bidzinski and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jacek J SznurkowskiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, ul. Smoluchowskiego 17, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9218-0245
Janusz RysDepartment of Tumor Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Kraków Branch, 44-102 Kraków, Poland.
Artur KowalikDepartment of Molecular Diagnostics, Holy Cross Cancer Center, 25-735 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3718-999X
Agnieszka Zolciak-SiwinskaDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 00-001 Warsaw, Poland.
Lubomir BodnarFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8548-8778
Anita Chudecka-GlazDepartment of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.
Pawel BlecharzDepartment of Gynaecologic Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow Branch, 44-102 Kraków, Poland.
Aleksandra ZielinskaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Warsaw, 00-575 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8325-0261
Andrzej MarszalekDepartment of Tumor Pathology and Prophylaxis, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland.
Mariusz BidzinskiDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 00-001 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4767-6369
Wlodzimierz SawickiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Warsaw, 00-575 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0812-7877

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the increasing amount of published data suggesting that endometrial carcinoma is a heterogenic entity with possible different treatment sequences and post-treatment follow-up, the Polish Society of Gynecological Oncology (PSGO) has developed new guidelines.

aimto summarize the current evidence for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of endometrial carcinoma and to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.

methodsThe guidelines have been developed according to standards set by the guideline evaluation tool AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation). The strength of scientific evidence has been defined in agreement with The Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariff System (AOTMiT) guidelines for scientific evidence classification. The grades of recommendation have been based on the strength of evidence and the level of consensus of the PSGO development group.

conclusionBased on current evidence, both the implementation of the molecular classification of endometrial cancer patients at the beginning of the treatment sequence and the extension of the final postoperative pathological report of additional biomarkers are needed to optimize and improve treatment results as well as to pave the route for future clinical trials on targeted therapies.

Indexed as

adjuvantAGREEendometrial cancerfollow-upguidelineshereditary cancerimmunotherapyMMRDNSMPPOLETP53abn

Identifiers

PMID36836017
PMCPMC9959576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.