ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Effect of a Contrast Agent on Bone Mineral Density Measurement in the Spine and Hip Using QCT-Conversion Factor Recommendation.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond Bone Density Alone: Opportunistic Identification of Vertebral Compression Fractures in Breast Cancer Survivors Using Artificial Intelligence-Derived Vertebral Bone Density and Paraspinal Muscle-Fat Metrics.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The impact of iodinated contrast medium on bone mineral density (BMD) quantification in computed tomography: a monocentric retrospective study evaluating phases, sex and age differences.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- The Impact of Contrast Media on Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density Measured by Quantitative Computed Tomography.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2024Article
- Traumatic rib fracture patterns associated with bone mineral density statuses derived from CT images.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteoporosis causes an increased fracture risk. Clinically, osteoporosis is diagnosed late, usually after the first fracture occurs. This emphasizes the need for an early diagnosis of osteoporosis. However, computed tomography (CT) as routinely used for polytrauma scans cannot be used in the form of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) diagnosis because QCT can only be applied natively, i.e., without any contrast agent application. Here, we tested whether and how contrast agent application could be used for bone densitometry measurements.
methodsBone mineral density (BMD) was determined by QCT in the spine region of patients with and without the contrast agent Imeron 350. Corresponding scans were performed in the hip region to evaluate possible location-specific differences.
resultsMeasurements with and without contrast agent administration between spine and hip bones indicate that the corresponding BMD values were reproducibly different between spine and hips, indicating that Imeron 350 application has a location-specific effect. We determined location-specific conversion factors that allow us then to determine the BMD values relevant for osteoporosis diagnosis.
conclusionsResults show that contrast administration cannot be used directly for CT diagnostics because the agent significantly alters BMD values. However, location-specific conversion factors can be established, which are likely to depend on additional parameters such as the weight and corresponding BMI of the patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.