Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36835990›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

Key-Point Detection Algorithm of Deep Learning Can Predict Lower Limb Alignment with Simple Knee Radiographs.

Hee Seung Nam, Sang Hyun Park, Jade Pei Yuik Ho, Seong Yun Park, Joon Hee Cho, Yong Seuk Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Deep Learning-based Alignment Measurement in Knee Radiographs.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Femorotibial angle scan-rescan reproducibility: A high-precision calculation on a large cohort.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hee Seung NamDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si 13620 82, Republic of Korea.
Sang Hyun ParkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si 13620 82, Republic of Korea.
Jade Pei Yuik HoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si 13620 82, Republic of Korea.
Seong Yun ParkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si 13620 82, Republic of Korea.
Joon Hee ChoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si 13620 82, Republic of Korea.
Yong Seuk LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si 13620 82, Republic of Korea.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2021R1A2C1092657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: There have been many attempts to predict the weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio using simple knee radiographs. Using a convolutional neural network (CNN), we focused on predicting the WBL ratio quantitatively. (2) Methods: From March 2003 to December 2021, 2410 patients with 4790 knee AP radiographs were randomly selected using stratified random sampling. Our dataset was cropped by four points annotated by a specialist with a 10-pixel margin. The model predicted our interest points, which were both plateau points, i.e., starting WBL point and exit WBL point. The resulting value of the model was analyzed in two ways: pixel units and WBL error values. (3) Results: The mean accuracy (MA) was increased from around 0.5 using a 2-pixel unit to around 0.8 using 6 pixels in both the validation and the test sets. When the tibial plateau length was taken as 100%, the MA was increased from approximately 0.1, using 1%, to approximately 0.5, using 5% in both the validation and the test sets. (4) Conclusions: The DL-based key-point detection algorithm for predicting lower limb alignment through labeling using simple knee AP radiographs demonstrated comparable accuracy to that of the direct measurement using whole leg radiographs. Using this algorithm, the WBL ratio prediction with simple knee AP radiographs could be useful to diagnose lower limb alignment in osteoarthritis patients in primary care.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkkneemachine learningpredictionweight-bearing line

Identifiers

PMID36835990
PMCPMC9959348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.