Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36835835›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

The Spread of Exhaled Air and Aerosols during Physical Exercise.

Hayder Alsaad, Gereon Schälte, Mario Schneeweiß, Lia Becher, Moritz Pollack, Amayu Wakoya Gena, Marcel Schweiker, Maria Hartmann, Conrad Voelker, Rolf Rossaint and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hayder AlsaadDepartment of Building Physics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Bauhaus-University Weimar, 99423 Weimar, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7738-0193
Gereon SchälteDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3948-7050
Mario SchneeweißDepartment of Building Physics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Bauhaus-University Weimar, 99423 Weimar, Germany.
Lia BecherDepartment of Building Physics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Bauhaus-University Weimar, 99423 Weimar, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8610-0958
Moritz PollackDepartment of Building Physics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Bauhaus-University Weimar, 99423 Weimar, Germany.
Amayu Wakoya GenaDepartment of Building Physics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Bauhaus-University Weimar, 99423 Weimar, Germany.
Marcel SchweikerHealthy Living Spaces Lab, Institute for Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3906-4688
Maria HartmannDepartment of Building Physics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Bauhaus-University Weimar, 99423 Weimar, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9409-097X
Conrad VoelkerDepartment of Building Physics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Bauhaus-University Weimar, 99423 Weimar, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3687-0177
Rolf RossaintDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Matthias IrrgangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Funding

Bauhaus-University WeimarDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 444059583RWTH Aachen UniversityVILLUM FONDEN 21055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical exercise demonstrates a special case of aerosol emission due to its associated elevated breathing rate. This can lead to a faster spread of airborne viruses and respiratory diseases. Therefore, this study investigates cross-infection risk during training. Twelve human subjects exercised on a cycle ergometer under three mask scenarios: no mask, surgical mask, and FFP2 mask. The emitted aerosols were measured in a grey room with a measurement setup equipped with an optical particle sensor. The spread of expired air was qualitatively and quantitatively assessed using schlieren imaging. Moreover, user satisfaction surveys were conducted to evaluate the comfort of wearing face masks during training. The results indicated that both surgical and FFP2 masks significantly reduced particles emission with a reduction efficiency of 87.1% and 91.3% of all particle sizes, respectively. However, compared to surgical masks, FFP2 masks provided a nearly tenfold greater reduction of the particle size range with long residence time in the air (0.3-0.5 μm). Furthermore, the investigated masks reduced exhalation spreading distances to less than 0.15 m and 0.1 m in the case of the surgical mask and FFP2 mask, respectively. User satisfaction solely differed with respect to perceived dyspnea between no mask and FFP2 mask conditions.

Indexed as

cycle ergometerparticles concentrationschlieren imagingsporttraininguser satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID36835835
PMCPMC9961458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.