Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36835610›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Interaction of Ceramic Implant Materials with Immune System.

Guzel Rafikova, Svetlana Piatnitskaia, Elena Shapovalova, Svyatoslav Chugunov, Victor Kireev, Daria Ialiukhova, Azat Bilyalov, Valentin Pavlov, Julia Kzhyshkowska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guzel RafikovaLaboratory of Immunology, Institute of Urology and Clinical Oncology, Bashkir State Medical University, 450008 Ufa, Russia.
Svetlana PiatnitskaiaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine, Bashkir State Medical University, 450008 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4317-8146
Elena ShapovalovaDepartment of Chemistry, Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3640-7040
Svyatoslav ChugunovSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, 121205 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0670-8152
Victor KireevInstitute of Fundamental Medicine, Bashkir State Medical University, 450008 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3550-6541
Daria IaliukhovaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine, Bashkir State Medical University, 450008 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5229-275X
Azat BilyalovInstitute of Fundamental Medicine, Bashkir State Medical University, 450008 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1273-9430
Valentin PavlovBashkir State Medical University, 450008 Ufa, Russia.
Julia KzhyshkowskaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine, Bashkir State Medical University, 450008 Ufa, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-0898-3075

Funding

Government of the Republic of Bashkortostan UG-477Ministry of RF Priority 20-30 for TSU
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immuno-compatibility of implant materials is a key issue for both initial and long-term implant integration. Ceramic implants have several advantages that make them highly promising for long-term medical solutions. These beneficial characteristics include such things as the material availability, possibility to manufacture various shapes and surface structures, osteo-inductivity and osteo-conductivity, low level of corrosion and general biocompatibility. The immuno-compatibility of an implant essentially depends on the interaction with local resident immune cells and, first of all, macrophages. However, in the case of ceramics, these interactions are insufficiently understood and require intensive experimental examinations. Our review summarizes the state of the art in variants of ceramic implants: mechanical properties, different chemical modifications of the basic material, surface structures and modifications, implant shapes and porosity. We collected the available information about the interaction of ceramics with the immune system and highlighted the studies that reported ceramic-specific local or systemic effects on the immune system. We disclosed the gaps in knowledge and outlined the perspectives for the identification to ceramic-specific interactions with the immune system using advanced quantitative technologies. We discussed the approaches for ceramic implant modification and pointed out the need for data integration using mathematic modelling of the multiple ceramic implant characteristics and their contribution for long-term implant bio- and immuno-compatibility.

Indexed as

Dental MaterialsProstheses and ImplantsCeramicsMacrophagesTechnologyDental Materialsbioceramichealingimmune responseinflammationinnate immunitymacrophageregenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID36835610
PMCPMC9959507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.