Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36835233›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Clinical Trials Targeting Secondary Damage after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Zin Z Khaing, Jessica Y Chen, Gevick Safarians, Sohib Ezubeik, Nicolas Pedroncelli, Rebecca D Duquette, Tobias Prasse, Stephanie K Seidlits

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zin Z KhaingDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5652-5891
Jessica Y ChenDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4833-6756
Gevick SafariansDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6725-7896
Sohib EzubeikDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Nicolas PedroncelliDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Rebecca D DuquetteDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Tobias PrasseDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3767-5461
Stephanie K SeidlitsDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3881-7166

Funding

Role of physical training and intraspinal hemodynamic changes in the recovery of forelimb function after cervical spinal cord injury in ratsR01NS121191 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KHAING, ZIN Z · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
Tissue-Engineered Models of Microvessel-Mediated Glioblastoma InvasionR01CA241927 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI SEIDLITS, STEPHANIE KRISTIN · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
Defining microvascular structure and function in the aged cervical spinal cordR03AG073929 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KHAING, ZIN Z · 2022 to 2023
$156k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA241927NIA NIH HHS R03 AG073929NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS121191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) often causes loss of sensory and motor function resulting in a significant reduction in quality of life for patients. Currently, no therapies are available that can repair spinal cord tissue. After the primary SCI, an acute inflammatory response induces further tissue damage in a process known as secondary injury. Targeting secondary injury to prevent additional tissue damage during the acute and subacute phases of SCI represents a promising strategy to improve patient outcomes. Here, we review clinical trials of neuroprotective therapeutics expected to mitigate secondary injury, focusing primarily on those in the last decade. The strategies discussed are broadly categorized as acute-phase procedural/surgical interventions, systemically delivered pharmacological agents, and cell-based therapies. In addition, we summarize the potential for combinatorial therapies and considerations.

Indexed as

Neuroprotective AgentsSpinal Cord InjuriesClinical Trials as TopicHumansQuality of LifeSpinal CordNeuroprotective Agentsacute and sub-acute strategiesbiomaterialsneuroprotective therapiesspinal cord injury repair

Identifiers

PMID36835233
PMCPMC9960771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.