Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36835168›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

The Use of Collagen-Based Materials in Bone Tissue Engineering.

Lu Fan, Yanru Ren, Steffen Emmert, Ivica Vučković, Sanja Stojanovic, Stevo Najman, Reinhard Schnettler, Mike Barbeck, Katja Schenke-Layland, Xin Xiong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Bone Fusion in the Cervical Spine: Where Are We Now?Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Unraveling the Potential ofBiomacromolecules · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lu FanNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Markwiesenstr. 55, 72770 Reutlingen, Germany.
Yanru RenClinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Strempelstraße 13, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6745-9471
Steffen EmmertClinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Strempelstraße 13, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5630-4204
Ivica VučkovićDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Clinic for Dental Medicine, 18000 Niš, Serbia.
Sanja StojanovicDepartment for Cell and Tissue Engineering, Scientific Research Center for Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.
Stevo NajmanDepartment for Cell and Tissue Engineering, Scientific Research Center for Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-2411-9802
Reinhard SchnettlerUniversity Medical Centre, Justus Liebig University of Giessen, 35390 Giessen, Germany.
Mike BarbeckClinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, Strempelstraße 13, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3001-1347
Katja Schenke-LaylandNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Markwiesenstr. 55, 72770 Reutlingen, Germany.
Xin XiongNMI Natural and Medical Sciences Institute at the University of Tübingen, Markwiesenstr. 55, 72770 Reutlingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0902-7886

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research 13GW0400AFederal Ministry of Education and Research 13GW0400CFederal Ministry of Education and Research 13GW0430BGerman Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, DFG) 449916462State Ministry of Baden-Württemberg for Economic Affairs, Labor, and Tourism NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic bone substitute materials (BSMs) are becoming the general trend, replacing autologous grafting for bone tissue engineering (BTE) in orthopedic research and clinical practice. As the main component of bone matrix, collagen type I has played a critical role in the construction of ideal synthetic BSMs for decades. Significant strides have been made in the field of collagen research, including the exploration of various collagen types, structures, and sources, the optimization of preparation techniques, modification technologies, and the manufacture of various collagen-based materials. However, the poor mechanical properties, fast degradation, and lack of osteoconductive activity of collagen-based materials caused inefficient bone replacement and limited their translation into clinical reality. In the area of BTE, so far, attempts have focused on the preparation of collagen-based biomimetic BSMs, along with other inorganic materials and bioactive substances. By reviewing the approved products on the market, this manuscript updates the latest applications of collagen-based materials in bone regeneration and highlights the potential for further development in the field of BTE over the next ten years.

Indexed as

Biomimetic MaterialsBone SubstitutesBiocompatible MaterialsBone and BonesBone RegenerationCollagenTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsBone SubstitutesCollagenbone substitute materialsbone tissue engineeringcollagencollagen modificationscomposite bone scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID36835168
PMCPMC9963569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.