Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36834477›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2023

Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) as a Surrogate Efficacy-Response Biomarker in AML.

Elisa Meddi, Arianna Savi, Federico Moretti, Flavia Mallegni, Raffaele Palmieri, Giovangiacinto Paterno, Elisa Buzzatti, Maria Ilaria Del Principe, Francesco Buccisano, Adriano Venditti and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. MRD-directed and risk-adapted individualized stratified treatment of AML.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Elisa MeddiHematology, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Arianna SaviHematology, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Federico MorettiHematology, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6730-5296
Flavia MallegniHematology, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Raffaele PalmieriHematology, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2855-8121
Giovangiacinto PaternoHematology, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Elisa BuzzattiHematology, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3478-5083
Maria Ilaria Del PrincipeHematology, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Francesco BuccisanoHematology, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4320-9253
Adriano VendittiHematology, Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0245-0553
Luca MaurilloHematology, Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7297-4988

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) many patients experience relapse, despite the achievement of morphological complete remission; therefore, conventional morphologic criteria are currently considered inadequate for assessing the quality of the response after treatment. Quantification of measurable residual disease (MRD) has been established as a strong prognostic marker in AML and patients that test MRD negative have lower relapse rates and better survival than those who test positive. Different techniques, varying in their sensitivity and applicability to patients, are available for the measurement of MRD and their use as a guide for selecting the most optimal post-remission therapy is an area of active investigation. Although still controversial, MRD prognostic value promises to support drug development serving as a surrogate biomarker, potentially useful for accelerating the regulatory approval of new agents. In this review, we will critically examine the methods used to detect MRD and its potential role as a study endpoint.

Indexed as

Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteBiomarkersHumansNeoplasm, ResidualRecurrenceRemission InductionBiomarkersacute myeloid leukemiameasurable residual diseasemolecular biologyprecision medicinesurrogate biomarker

Identifiers

PMID36834477
PMCPMC9967250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.