Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36834388›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Ethical, Legal, Organisational and Social Issues of Teleneurology: A Scoping Review.

Alezandra Torres-Castaño, Analía Abt-Sacks, Ana Toledo-Chávarri, José Carlos Suarez-Herrera, Janet Delgado-Rodríguez, Beatriz León-Salas, Yadira González-Hernández, Montserrat Carmona-Rodríguez, Pedro Serrano-Aguilar

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Digital health in stroke: a narrative review.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alezandra Torres-CastañoCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38320 Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4690-1421
Analía Abt-SacksCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38320 Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7153-8586
Ana Toledo-ChávarriCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38320 Tenerife, Spain.
José Carlos Suarez-HerreraEvaluation Unit of the Canary Islands Health Service (SESCS), 38109 Tenerife, Spain.
Janet Delgado-RodríguezCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38320 Tenerife, Spain.
Beatriz León-SalasCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38320 Tenerife, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5803-1756
Yadira González-HernándezCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38320 Tenerife, Spain.
Montserrat Carmona-RodríguezNetwork for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Pedro Serrano-AguilarCanary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), 38320 Tenerife, Spain.
Red de Investigación en Actividades Preventivas y Promoción de la Salud · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversidad de Granada · ESUniversidad de La Laguna · ESUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeurological disorders are the leading cause of disability and the second leading cause of death worldwide. Teleneurology (TN) allows neurology to be applied when the doctor and patient are not present in the same place, and sometimes not at the same time. In February 2021, the Spanish Ministry of Health requested a health technology assessment report on the implementation of TN as a complement to face-to-face neurological care.

methodsA scoping review was conducted to answer the question on the ethical, legal, social, organisational, patient (ELSI) and environmental impact of TN. The assessment of these aspects was carried out by adapting the EUnetHTA Core Model 3.0 framework, the criteria established by the Spanish Network of Health Technology Assessment Agencies and the analysis criteria of the European Validate (VALues In Doing Assessments of healthcare TEchnologies) project. Key stakeholders were invited to discuss their concerns about TN in an online meeting. Subsequently, the following electronic databases were consulted from 2016 to 10 June 2021: MEDLINE and EMBASE.

results79 studies met the inclusion criteria. This scoping review includes 37 studies related to acceptability and equity, 15 studies developed during COVID and 1 study on environmental aspects. Overall, the reported results reaffirm the necessary complementarity of TN with the usual face-to-face care.

conclusionsThis need for complementarity relates to factors such as acceptability, feasibility, risk of dehumanisation and aspects related to privacy and the confidentiality of sensitive data.

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansConfidentialityHumansPrivacyaccessibilityequityethicalhealth technology assessmentlegalorganizationalsocialteleneurology

Identifiers

PMID36834388
PMCPMC9962592
OpenAlexW4321374157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.