Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36834353›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Evaluation of a Novel Ambient Light Survey Question in the Cancer Prevention Study-3.

W Ryan Diver, Mariana G Figueiro, Mark S Rea, James M Hodge, W Dana Flanders, Charlie Zhong, Alpa V Patel, Susan M Gapstur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

W Ryan DiverDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5418-9000
Mariana G FigueiroLight and Health Research Center, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10025, USA.
Mark S ReaLight and Health Research Center, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10025, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8458-9876
James M HodgeDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6253-7394
W Dana FlandersDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4069-3262
Charlie ZhongDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA.
Alpa V PatelDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA.
Susan M GapsturDepartment of Population Science, American Cancer Society, Kennesaw, GA 30144, USA.

Funding

Methodology Issues in a Tailored Light Treatment for Persons with DementiaR01AG034157 · NIA · RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE · PI FIGUEIRO, MARIANA GROSS · 2010 to 2024
$7.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nighttime light exposure may increase cancer risk by disrupting the circadian system. However, there is no well-established survey method for measuring ambient light. In the Cancer Prevention Study-3, 732 men and women answered a light survey based on seven environments. The light environment in the past year was assessed twice, one year apart, and four one-week diaries were collected between the annual surveys. A total of 170 participants wore a meter to measure photopic illuminance and circadian stimulus (CS). Illuminance and CS values were estimated for lighting environments from measured values and evaluated with a cross validation approach. The kappas for self-reported light environment comparing the two annual surveys were 0.61 on workdays and 0.49 on non-workdays. Kappas comparing the annual survey to weekly diaries were 0.71 and 0.57 for work and non-workdays, respectively. Agreement was highest for reporting of darkness (95.3%), non-residential light (86.5%), and household light (75.6%) on workdays. Measured illuminance and CS identified three peaks of light (darkness, indoor lighting, and outdoor daytime light). Estimated illuminance and CS were correlated with the measured values overall (r = 0.77 and r = 0.67, respectively) but were less correlated within each light environment (r = 0.23-0.43). The survey has good validity to assess ambient light for studies of human health.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsDarknessFemaleHumansLightingMaleSelf ReportSurveys and Questionnairesambient lightcircadian disruptionilluminancesurveyvalidation

Identifiers

PMID36834353
PMCPMC9959116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.