Observational studyInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023
Occupational Risk Factors by Sectors: An Observational Study of 20,000 Workers.
Observational study in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Impact of leadership styles on safety performance in risky workplaces: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluating Exoskeletons for WMSD Prevention: A Systematic Review of Applications and Ergonomic Approach in Occupational Settings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Pooled it
- Explainable AI for Well-Being Prediction From Lifestyle Data: 2-Study Design.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Work restrictions and Unfitness to work: Prevalence and risk factors a cross-sectional study on 70 000 occupational visits.PloS one · 2026Article
- Psychological and socio-contextual factors influencing preventive healthcare decision-making: evidence from IT and ITES companies in three cities of India.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Role-clarity, Attitudes, and Behavioral Control Predict Stakeholders' Involvement in Work-related Psychosocial Risk Management.Safety and health at work · 2025Article
- Occupational exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation among outdoor workers in Lisbon, 2023-first results of the MEAOW study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Observational
- Maternal occupational exposures during early stages of pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes in the NINFEA birth-cohort.PloS one · 2025Article
- Global burden of viral skin diseases from 1990 to 2021: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Occupational status and health disparities among workers-An empirical study based on China health and nutrition survey data.PloS one · 2025Article
- Credit-frequency compliance paradox and dual-track hazard evolution in urban occupational health.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Towards an assessment of psychosocial work factors in a multi-level mental health intervention in the workplace: results from the MENTUPP pilot-study.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to assess the prevalence of exposure by sector and the sectors of activity most exposed to each exposure, using routine occupational health data, and to quantify the risk of being exposed.
methodOccupational risk factors were assessed by workers followed by the Occupational Health Service of Cher, using self-reported questionnaires. The sectors of activity were grouped into seven sectors, and the risks were grouped into six occupational exposure groups. Comparisons were made using the Chi-squared test and Cramer's V, and the odds ratios were calculated by using logistic regression.
resultsWe included 19,891 workers. The construction sector had the highest prevalence (
conclusionPsychosocial risk factors were commonly reported in all sectors. Workers in the construction, human health, and social sectors seem to report more exposures than those in other sectors. The analysis of occupational exposures is a necessary basis to build an efficient preventive strategy for occupational health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.