Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36834267›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Too Committed to Switch Off-Capturing and Organizing the Full Range of Work-Related Rumination from Detachment to Overcommitment.

Oliver Weigelt, J Charlotte Seidel, Lucy Erber, Johannes Wendsche, Yasemin Z Varol, Gerald M Weiher, Petra Gierer, Claudia Sciannimanica, Richard Janzen, Christine J Syrek

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Oliver WeigeltWilhelm Wundt Institute of Psychology, Leipzig University, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4328-3445
J Charlotte SeidelWilhelm Wundt Institute of Psychology, Leipzig University, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany.
Lucy ErberWilhelm Wundt Institute of Psychology, Leipzig University, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany.
Johannes WendscheFederal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Section 3 Work and Health, D-01099 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4228-4016
Yasemin Z VarolEducational Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, D-60629 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9101-1511
Gerald M WeiherEducational Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, D-60629 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2733-6076
Petra GiererWork and Organizational Psychology, University of Hagen, D-58084 Hagen, Germany.
Claudia SciannimanicaWork and Organizational Psychology, University of Hagen, D-58084 Hagen, Germany.
Richard JanzenWilhelm Wundt Institute of Psychology, Leipzig University, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6726-2019
Christine J SyrekBusiness Psychology, University of Applied Sciences Bonn-Rhein-Sieg, D-53359 Rheinbach, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1668-8845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Work-related thoughts during off-job time have been studied extensively in occupational health psychology and related fields. We provide a focused review of the research on overcommitment-a component within the effort-reward imbalance model-and aim to connect this line of research to the most commonly studied aspects of work-related rumination. Drawing on this integrative review, we analyze survey data on ten facets of work-related rumination, namely (1) overcommitment, (2) psychological detachment, (3) affective rumination, (4) problem-solving pondering, (5) positive work reflection, (6) negative work reflection, (7) distraction, (8) cognitive irritation, (9) emotional irritation, and (10) inability to recover. First, we apply exploratory factor analysis to self-reported survey data from 357 employees to calibrate overcommitment items and to position overcommitment within the nomological net of work-related rumination constructs. Second, we apply confirmatory factor analysis to self-reported survey data from 388 employees to provide a more specific test of uniqueness vs. overlap among these constructs. Third, we apply relative weight analysis to assess the unique criterion-related validity of each work-related rumination facet regarding (1) physical fatigue, (2) cognitive fatigue, (3) emotional fatigue, (4) burnout, (5) psychosomatic complaints, and (6) satisfaction with life. Our results suggest that several measures of work-related rumination (e.g., overcommitment and cognitive irritation) can be used interchangeably. Emotional irritation and affective rumination emerge as the strongest unique predictors of fatigue, burnout, psychosomatic complaints, and satisfaction with life. Our study is intended to assist researchers in making informed decisions on selecting scales for their research and paves the way for integrating research on the effort-reward imbalance and work-related rumination.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalEmotionsHumansJob SatisfactionProblem SolvingRewardStress, PsychologicalSurveys and Questionnairesaffective ruminationburnoutirritationnegative work reflectionovercommitmentpositive work reflectionproblem-solving ponderingpsychological detachmentsatisfaction with lifework-related rumination

Identifiers

PMID36834267
PMCPMC9967488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.