Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36834213›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Screening for and Disclosure of Domestic Violence during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of the PRICOV-19 Cross-Sectional Study in 33 Countries.

Elizaveta Fomenko, Ines Keygnaert, Esther Van Poel, Claire Collins, Raquel Gómez Bravo, Päivi Korhonen, Merja K Laine, Liubove Murauskiene, Athina Tatsioni, Sara Willems

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Elizaveta FomenkoDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1089-8710
Ines KeygnaertDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1707-0254
Esther Van PoelDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8470-9214
Claire CollinsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8967-5159
Raquel Gómez BravoCentre Hospitalier Neuropsychiatrique, Rehaklinik, L-9002 Ettelbruck, Luxembourg.
Päivi KorhonenDepartment of General Practice, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, 20521 Turku, Finland.
Merja K LaineDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Liubove MurauskienePublic Health Department, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, LT-01513 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-6625-8843
Athina TatsioniResearch Unit for General Medicine and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7652-6592
Sara WillemsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6349-7785
Ghent University · BECentre Hospitalier de Luxembourg · LUUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Ioannina · GRUniversity of Turku · FIVilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic left no one untouched, and reports of domestic violence (DV) increased during the crisis. DV victims rarely seek professional help, yet when they do so, they often disclose it to their general practitioner (GP), with whom they have a trusting relationship. GPs rarely screen and hence rarely take the initiative to discuss DV with patients, although victims indicate that offering this opportunity would facilitate their disclosure. This paper aims to describe the frequency of screening for DV by GPs and disclosure of DV by patients to the GP during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to identify key elements that could potentially explain differences in screening for and disclosure of DV. The PRICOV-19 data of 4295 GP practices from 33 countries were included in the analyses, with practices nested in countries. Two stepwise forward clustered ordinal logistic regressions were performed. Only 11% of the GPs reported (much) more disclosure of DV by patients during COVID-19, and 12% reported having screened for DV (much). Most significant associations with screening for and disclosure of DV concerned general (pro)active communication. However, (pro)active communication was performed less frequently for DV than for health conditions, which might indicate that GPs are insufficiently aware of the general magnitude of DV and its impact on patients and society, and its approach/management. Thus, professional education and training for GPs about DV seems highly and urgently needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19Domestic ViolenceCross-Sectional StudiesDisclosureHumansMass ScreeningPandemicsCOVID-19disclosuredomestic violenceequitygeneral practitionerinfectious diseasesPRICOV-19primary health carequality of carescreening

Identifiers

PMID36834213
PMCPMC9964689
OpenAlexW4321248183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.