SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023
Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Comparing Medtronic's Evolut PRO and Evolut R: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.
Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovation and Challenges in Materials for Transcatheter Aortic Valves.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Review
- Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with Abbott's Portico Compared to Edwards' SAPIEN 3: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Rescuing a Popped-Up Prosthesis: Redo TAVI Using a Novel Snaring and Balloon Displacement Technique.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Remote ECG monitoring as a diagnostic tool for therapeutic strategies after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: rationale and design of the DRAGON-TAVI randomized trial.Cardiology journal · 2026Article
- Redefining Aortic Valve Replacement: The Transition from Open Surgery to Transcatheter Innovation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation with concomitant cardiac surgery: a state-of-the-art review.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025Review
- Paravalvular Leak in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Review of Current Challenges and Future Directions.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Early clinical and hemodynamic outcomes of balloon-expandable versus self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with large aortic annulus: a study-level meta-analysis.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024Review
- Zero-contrast imaging for the assessment of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in candidates with renal dysfunction.Renal failure · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a broadly acceptable alternative to AV surgery in patients with aortic stenosis (AS). New valve designs are becoming available to address the shortcomings of their predecessors and improve clinical outcomes.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to compare Medtronic's Evolut PRO, a new valve, with the previous Evolut R design. Procedural, functional and clinical endpoints according to the VARC-2 criteria were assessed.
resultsEleven observational studies involving N = 12,363 patients were included. Evolut PRO patients differed regarding age (
conclusionsThe evidence shows good short-term outcomes of both the Evolut PRO and Evolut R prostheses, with no differences in clinical and procedural endpoints. The Evolut PRO was associated with a lower rate of moderate-to-severe PVL and major bleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.