ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023
A Comprehensive Review on Wastewater Nitrogen Removal and Its Recovery Processes.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technical Perspective of Landfill Leachate Treatment via Membrane Distillation Using Waste Heat from Biogas Combustion for Power Generation.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Article
- Toward Energy Efficient Electrochemical Valorization of Waste Nitrate and Sulfide.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Construction of RecombinantMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Biomethane Production from Stillage: The Role of Temperature, Initial Substrate Load, and Inoculum Variability.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Electrocatalytic Hydrogenation of Bioinhibiting Aromatics to Bioavailable Aliphatics for Wastewater Denitrification Enhancement.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Synergistic strategies for pollution and carbon emission reduction in China's wastewater treatment: A comprehensive tiered assessment and benchmarking framework.Eco-Environment & Health · 2025Article
- Article
- Associative analysis of sludge microbiota and wastewater degradation efficacy within swine farm sludge systems.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Evidence of Potential Anammox Activities from Rice Paddy Soils in Microaerobic and Anaerobic Conditions.Biology · 2024Article
- Biofilm reactors for the treatment of used water in space:potential, challenges, and future perspectives.Biofilm · 2023Article
- Synergistic Promotion of Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Orange by Fluorine- and Silicon-Doped TiOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Discharging large amounts of domestic and industrial wastewater drastically increases the reactive nitrogen content in aquatic ecosystems, which causes severe ecological stress and biodiversity loss. This paper reviews three common types of denitrification processes, including physical, chemical, and biological processes, and mainly focuses on the membrane technology for nitrogen recovery. The applicable conditions and effects of various treatment methods, as well as the advantages, disadvantages, and influencing factors of membrane technologies, are summarized. Finally, it is proposed that developing effective combinations of different treatment methods and researching new processes with high efficiency, economy, and energy savings, such as microbial fuel cells and anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactors, are the research and development directions of wastewater treatment processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.