Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36833793›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Personalized Computerized Training for Cognitive Dysfunction after COVID-19: A Before-and-After Feasibility Pilot Study.

Jon Andoni Duñabeitia, Francisco Mera, Óscar Baro, Tamen Jadad-Garcia, Alejandro R Jadad

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05571852 (Before-and-after Study on the Impact of a Home-based Personalized Computerized Training Program on Cognitive Dysfunction Associated With Long COVID), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05571852 nacompletednot on this map

Before-and-after Study on the Impact of a Home-based Personalized Computerized Training Program on Cognitive Dysfunction Associated With Long COVID

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Antonio de NebrijaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled73ConditionsPost-Acute COVID-19, Long COVIDArmsCogniFit's CCT Post COVID-19
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intervention modalities for brain fog caused by long-COVID: systematic review of the literature.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Codeveloping a Novel Intervention for People With Post-COVID Condition: The Balance-ACT Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jon Andoni DuñabeitiaAcqVA Aurora Center, Department of Languages and Culture, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, 9019 Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3312-8559
Francisco MeraUnidad Long COVID y Síndromes Postvirales, Blue Health Care, 28036 Madrid, Spain.
Óscar BaroCentro de Salud de Galapagar, 28260 Madrid, Spain.
Tamen Jadad-GarciaVivenxia Group, Beverly Hills, CA 90210, USA.
Alejandro R JadadCentre for Digital Therapeutics, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current pilot study was set to evaluate the feasibility and potential benefit of a personalized computerized cognitive training (CCT) intervention to improve cognitive function among people living with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC). Seventy three adults who self-reported cognitive dysfunction more than 3 months after a diagnosis of COVID-19 took part in an 8-week training study. Participants' general cognitive function was assessed before they completed as many cognitive daily training sessions as they wished during an 8-week period, using a personalized CCT application at home. At the end of this period, participants repeated the general cognitive function assessment. The differences between the scores at 8 weeks and baseline in five cognitive domains (attention, memory, coordination, perception, reasoning), complemented with analyses of the changes based on the participants' age, training time, self-reported health level at baseline and time since the initial COVID-19 infection. Participants had significant cognitive dysfunction and self-reported negative health levels at baseline. Most of the participants obtained higher scores after CCT in each of the domains as compared with baseline. The magnitude of this score increase was high across domains. It is concluded that a self-administered CCT based on gamified cognitive tasks could be an effective way to ameliorate cognitive dysfunction in persons with PASC. The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT05571852.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionCOVID-19AdultCognitionFeasibility StudiesHumansPilot ProjectsPost-Acute COVID-19 Syndromecomputerized cognitive trainingdigital therapeuticsLong COVIDpandemicspost-acute sequelae of COVID-19

Identifiers

PMID36833793
PMCPMC9966004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.