Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36833755›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023

Telemedicine Use and the Perceived Risk of COVID-19: Patient Experience.

Hassan Hosseinzadeh, Zubair Ahmed Ratan, Kamrun Nahar, Ann Dadich, Abdullah Al-Mamun, Searat Ali, Marzieh Niknami, Iksheta Verma, Joseph Edwards, Mahmmoud Shnaigat and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Public Telemedicine Policy in Brazilian Unified Health System: An Impact Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hassan HosseinzadehSchool of Health & Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8638-5372
Zubair Ahmed RatanSchool of Health & Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Kamrun NaharInstitute of Child and Mother Health (ICMH), Matuail, Dhaka 1362, Bangladesh.
Ann DadichSchool of Business, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5767-1794
Abdullah Al-MamunSchool of Business, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Searat AliSchool of Business, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7250-8116
Marzieh NiknamiThe Practice-Bundanoon, Bundanoon, NSW 2578, Australia.
Iksheta VermaSchool of Health & Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4927-0231
Joseph EdwardsSchool of Health & Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Mahmmoud ShnaigatSchool of Health & Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Md Abdul MalakDepartment of Geography and Environment, Jagannath University, 9-10 Chittaranjan Ave, Dhaka 1100, Bangladesh.
Md Mustafizur RahmanInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-6496-703X
Anthony OkelySchool of Health & Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1626-8170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 outbreak resulted in an increased demand for telemedicine worldwide. Telemedicine is a technology-based virtual platform that allows the exchange of clinical data and images over remote distances. This study aims to examine the impact of the perceived risk of COVID-19 on telemedicine use in Bangladesh.

methodsThis explanatory study was conducted in hospital settings across Dhaka city in Bangladesh. Patients were eligible to participate if they were aged 18 years or over and had used telemedicine in a hospital at least once since the COVID-19 outbreak. Outcome variables included sociodemographic, the perceived risk of COVID-19, and telehealth use. Study data were collected using an online and paper-based survey.

resultsA total of 550 patients participated in this study, mostly male (66.4%), single (58.2%), and highly educated (74.2%). The means of the different domains of telemedicine use reflected a high degree of perceived benefit, accessibility, and satisfaction but a lower degree of privacy and discomfort, care personnel expertise, and usability. COVID 19 perceived risk predicted between 13.0% and 26.6% of variance in telemedicine domains, while the effects of demographic variables were controlled or removed. The perceived risk of COVID-19 was negatively correlated with privacy and discomfort, as well as care personnel concerns. Low and high levels of perceived COVID-19 risk were less likely to encourage the use of telemedicine as a risk reduction tool. DISCUSSION: The participants were mainly satisfied with telemedicine, finding it beneficial and accessible; however, many were concerned about privacy, care personnel expertise, and its usability. The perceived risk of COVID-19 was a strong predictor (contributor) of telemedicine use, suggesting that risk perception can be used to encourage telemedicine use as a risk reduction strategy during pandemics; however, a medium level of risk was more promising.

Indexed as

COVID-19TelemedicineBangladeshFemaleHumansMalePatient Outcome AssessmentPatient SatisfactionSARS-CoV-2COVID-19risk perceptiontelecaretelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36833755
PMCPMC9960459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.