ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2023
Freshwater Water-Quality Criteria for Chloride and Guidance for the Revision of the Water-Quality Standard in China.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Efficacy of chitinases from mangrove wetland derivedFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Assessment of industrial pollution and water quality in the Nile River using GIS-based indices at Aswan, Egypt.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multiorgan Oxidative Damage and Gene Expression Modulation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Chloride Interferences in Wet Chemical Oxidation Measurements: Plausible Mechanisms and Implications.ACS ES&T water · 2024Article
- Acute and sub-acute toxicity study of aqueous and methanol root extract ofToxicology reports · 2024Article
- Groundwater Hardness and Alkalinity As Risk Factors for Kidney Stone Disease in Alwar, India: An Ecological Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions in Aquatic Life Criteria Research in China.Toxics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The chloride in water frequently exceeds the standard; directly quoting foreign water-quality criteria (WQC) or standards will inevitably reduce the scientific value of the water-quality standard (WQS) in China. Additionally, this may lead to the under- or overprotection of water bodies. This study summarized the sources, distribution, pollution status, and hazards of chloride in China's water bodies. Additionally, we compared and analyzed the basis for setting WQS limits for chloride in China; we systematically analyzed the basis for setting the WQC for chloride in foreign countries, especially the United States. Finally, we collected and screened data on the toxicity of chloride to aquatic organisms; we also used the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) method to derive the WQC value for chloride, which is 187.5 mg·L
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.