Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36833377›Full record

ReviewGenes2023

Study on Sperm-Cell Detection Using YOLOv5 Architecture with Labaled Dataset.

Michal Dobrovolny, Jakub Benes, Jaroslav Langer, Ondrej Krejcar, Ali Selamat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michal DobrovolnyFaculty of Informatics and Management, Center for Basic and Applied Research, University of Hradec Kralove, 500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-7476-1193
Jakub BenesFaculty of Informatics and Management, Center for Basic and Applied Research, University of Hradec Kralove, 500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6247-7002
Jaroslav LangerFaculty of Informatics and Management, Center for Basic and Applied Research, University of Hradec Kralove, 500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-6538-6704
Ondrej KrejcarFaculty of Informatics and Management, Center for Basic and Applied Research, University of Hradec Kralove, 500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-5992-2574
Ali SelamatFaculty of Informatics and Management, Center for Basic and Applied Research, University of Hradec Kralove, 500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-9746-8459

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infertility has recently emerged as a severe medical problem. The essential elements in male infertility are sperm morphology, sperm motility, and sperm density. In order to analyze sperm motility, density, and morphology, laboratory experts do a semen analysis. However, it is simple to err when using a subjective interpretation based on laboratory observation. In this work, a computer-aided sperm count estimation approach is suggested to lessen the impact of experts in semen analysis. Object detection techniques concentrating on sperm motility estimate the number of active sperm in the semen. This study provides an overview of other techniques that we can compare. The Visem dataset from the Association for Computing Machinery was used to test the proposed strategy. We created a labelled dataset to prove that our network can detect sperms in images. The best not-super tuned result is mAP 72.15.

Indexed as

Infertility, MaleSemenHumansMaleSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaSperm Motilitycomputer-aided sperm analysissmall-object detectionsperm-cell detectionyolo

Identifiers

PMID36833377
PMCPMC9957213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.