Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36833322›Full record

ArticleGenes2023

Integrating Parental Phenotypic Data Enhances Prediction Accuracy of Hybrids in Wheat Traits.

Osval A Montesinos-López, Alison R Bentley, Carolina Saint Pierre, Leonardo Crespo-Herrera, Josafhat Salinas Ruiz, Patricia Edwigis Valladares-Celis, Abelardo Montesinos-López, José Crossa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Osval A Montesinos-LópezFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima 28040, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3973-6547
Alison R BentleyInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Mexico City 52640, Mexico.
Carolina Saint PierreInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Mexico City 52640, Mexico.
Leonardo Crespo-HerreraInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Mexico City 52640, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0506-4700
Josafhat Salinas RuizColegio de Postgraduados Campus Córdoba, Km. 348 Carretera Federal Córdoba-Veracruz, Amatlán de los Reyes, Veracruz 94946, Mexico.
Patricia Edwigis Valladares-CelisBachillerato 22, Universidad de Colima, Cuauhtémoc, Colima 28510, Mexico.
Abelardo Montesinos-LópezCentro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44430, Mexico.
José CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Mexico City 52640, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) is a methodology that is revolutionizing plant breeding because it can select candidate genotypes without phenotypic evaluation in the field. However, its practical implementation in hybrid prediction remains challenging since many factors affect its accuracy. The main objective of this study was to research the genomic prediction accuracy of wheat hybrids by adding covariates with the hybrid parental phenotypic information to the model. Four types of different models (MA, MB, MC, and MD) with one covariate (same trait to be predicted) (MA_C, MB_C, MC_C, and MD_C) or several covariates (of the same trait and other correlated traits) (MA_AC, MB_AC, MC_AC, and MD_AC) were studied. We found that the four models with parental information outperformed models without parental information in terms of mean square error by at least 14.1% (MA vs. MA_C), 5.5% (MB vs. MB_C), 51.4% (MC vs. MC_C), and 6.4% (MD vs. MD_C) when parental information of the same trait was used and by at least 13.7% (MA vs. MA_AC), 5.3% (MB vs. MB_AC), 55.1% (MC vs. MC_AC), and 6.0% (MD vs. MD_AC) when parental information of the same trait and other correlated traits were used. Our results also show a large gain in prediction accuracy when covariates were considered using the parental phenotypic information, as opposed to marker information. Finally, our results empirically demonstrate that a significant improvement in prediction accuracy was gained by adding parental phenotypic information as covariates; however, this is expensive since, in many breeding programs, the parental phenotypic information is unavailable.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticTriticumPhenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single Nucleotidecorrelated traitsgenomic predictionparental informationprediction accuracy

Identifiers

PMID36833322
PMCPMC9957193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.