Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36833157›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Effects of Velocity-Based versus Percentage-Based Resistance Training on Explosive Neuromuscular Adaptations and Anaerobic Power in Sport-College Female Basketball Players.

Mingyang Zhang, Duanying Li, Jiaxin He, Xingyue Liang, Dongyu Li, Wenfeng Song, Shicong Ding, Jie Shu, Xiaoning Sun, Jian Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mingyang ZhangDigital Physical Training Laboratory, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou 510500, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1761-0297
Duanying LiDepartment of Physical Education, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou 510500, China.
Jiaxin HeDigital Physical Training Laboratory, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou 510500, China.
Xingyue LiangDigital Physical Training Laboratory, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou 510500, China.
Dongyu LiSchool of Athletic Training, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou 510500, China.
Wenfeng SongDepartment of Physical Education, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou 510500, China.
Shicong DingDepartment of Physical Education, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou 510500, China.
Jie ShuDigital Physical Training Laboratory, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou 510500, China.
Xiaoning SunDepartment of Physical Education, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou 510500, China.
Jian SunDepartment of Physical Education, Guangzhou Sport University, Guangzhou 510500, China.

Funding

National Social Science Foundation of China and Excellent Doctoral dissertation Project. Project name: Research on systematic biological principles of performance training in competitive sports No. 20FTYB008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of velocity-based resistance training (VBRT) and percentage-based resistance training (PBRT) on anaerobic ability, sprint performance, and jumping ability. Eighteen female basketball players from a Sport College were randomly divided into two groups: VBRT (n = 10) and PBRT (n = 8). The six-week intervention consisted of two sessions per week of free-weight back squats with linear periodization from 65% to 95%1RM. In PBRT, the weights lifted were fixed based on 1RM percentage, while in VBRT, the weights were adjusted based on individualized velocity profiles. The T-30m sprint time, relative power of countermovement jump (RP-CMJ), and Wingate test were evaluated. The Wingate test assessed peak power (PP), mean power (MP), fatigue index (FI), maximal velocity (Vmax), and total work (TW). Results showed that VBRT produced a very likely improvement in RP-CMJ, Vmax, PP, and FI (Hedges' g = 0.55, 0.93, 0.68, 0.53, respectively,

Indexed as

autoregulationfixed-loadingload monitoringload-velocity relationshipresistance trainingWingate anaerobic performance

Identifiers

PMID36833157
PMCPMC9956169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.