Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36833105›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Role of Genomic and Molecular Biology in the Modulation of the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Narrative Review and Perspectives.

Ilaria Cuccu, Ottavia D'Oria, Ludovica Sgamba, Emanuele De Angelis, Tullio Golia D'Augè, Camilla Turetta, Camilla Di Dio, Maria Scudo, Giorgio Bogani, Violante Di Donato and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Sentinel node mapping in endometrial cancer.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Translational cancer research · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ilaria CuccuDepartment of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Ottavia D'OriaDepartment of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3482-1523
Ludovica SgambaDepartment of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Emanuele De AngelisDepartment of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Tullio Golia D'AugèDepartment of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1018-3088
Camilla TurettaDepartment of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Camilla Di DioDepartment of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Maria ScudoDepartment of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Giorgio BoganiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8373-8569
Violante Di DonatoDepartment of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9254-5790
Innocenza PalaiaDepartment of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Giorgia PerniolaDepartment of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Federica TomaoDepartment of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Ludovico MuziiDepartment of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7195-9583
Andrea GianniniDepartment of Gynecological, Obstetrical and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4388-0082
Sapienza University of Rome · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is one of the most common gynecological malignancies in Western countries. Traditionally, loco-reginal dissemination and histological characteristics are the main prognostic factors. Nowadays, molecular and genomic profiling showed exciting results in terms of prognostication. According to the data provided by The Cancer Genome Atlas and other studies, molecular and genomic profiling might be useful in identifying patients al low, intermediate, and high risk of recurrence. However, data regarding the therapeutic value are scant. Several prospective studies are ongoing to identify the most appropriate adjuvant strategy in EC patients, especially for those with positive nodes and low volume disease. The molecular classification has offered the possibility to improve the risk stratification and management of EC. The aim of this review is to focus on the evolution of molecular classification in EC and its impact on the research approach and on clinical management. Molecular and genomic profiling might be useful to tailor the most appropriate adjuvant strategies in apparent early-stage EC.

Indexed as

endometrial cancergeneticsmolecularpersonalized treatmenttarget therapy

Identifiers

PMID36833105
PMCPMC9957190
OpenAlexW4320918557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.