ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2023
Improved Link Entropy with Dynamic Community Number Detection for Quantifying Significance of Edges in Complex Social Networks.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Co-Opetitive Bridging Structure in Rumor Cascades: A Multilayer Overlapping Community Approach with Information-Theoretic Characterization.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantifying Information Distribution in Social Networks: The Structural Entropy Index of Community (SEIC) for Twitter Communication Analysis.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Discovering communities in complex networks is essential in performing analyses, such as dynamics of political fragmentation and echo chambers in social networks. In this work, we study the problem of quantifying the significance of edges in a complex network, and propose a significantly improved version of the Link Entropy method. Using Louvain, Leiden and Walktrap methods, our proposal detects the number of communities in each iteration on discovering the communities. Running experiments on various benchmark networks, we show that our proposed method outperforms the Link Entropy method in quantifying edge significance. Considering also the computational complexities and possible defects, we conclude that Leiden or Louvain algorithms are the best choice for community number detection in quantifying edge significance. We also discuss designing a new algorithm for not only discovering the number of communities, but also computing the community membership uncertainties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.