Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36832713›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Assessing Search and Unsupervised Clustering Algorithms in Nested Sampling.

Lune Maillard, Fabio Finocchi, Martino Trassinelli

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. High-temperatureNature · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lune MaillardInstitut des Nanosciences de Paris, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France.
Fabio FinocchiInstitut des Nanosciences de Paris, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7048-5029
Martino TrassinelliInstitut des Nanosciences de Paris, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4414-1801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nested sampling is an efficient method for calculating Bayesian evidence in data analysis and partition functions of potential energies. It is based on an exploration using a dynamical set of sampling points that evolves to higher values of the sampled function. When several maxima are present, this exploration can be a very difficult task. Different codes implement different strategies. Local maxima are generally treated separately, applying cluster recognition of the sampling points based on machine learning methods. We present here the development and implementation of different search and clustering methods on the nested_fit code. Slice sampling and the uniform search method are added in addition to the random walk already implemented. Three new cluster recognition methods are also developed. The efficiency of the different strategies, in terms of accuracy and number of likelihood calls, is compared considering a series of benchmark tests, including model comparison and a harmonic energy potential. Slice sampling proves to be the most stable and accurate search strategy. The different clustering methods present similar results but with very different computing time and scaling. Different choices of the stopping criterion of the algorithm, another critical issue of nested sampling, are also investigated with the harmonic energy potential.

Indexed as

harmonic potentialnested samplingslice samplingunsupervised clustering

Identifiers

PMID36832713
PMCPMC9955770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.