Development of a Group Emergent Literacy Screening Tool.

Joana Cruz, Sofia Mendes, Sofia Marques, Diana Alves, Irene Cadime

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

Grasp Motor Representations Facilitate Conceptual Preparation in Speech Production.Journal of psycholinguistic research · 2026
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joana CruzCentro de Investigação em Psicologia para o Desenvolvimento, Instituto de Psicologia e Ciências da Educação, Universidade Lusíada Porto, 4100-346 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5104-6979

Sofia MendesCentro de Investigação em Psicologia para o Desenvolvimento, Instituto de Psicologia e Ciências da Educação, Universidade Lusíada Porto, 4100-346 Porto, Portugal.

Sofia MarquesCentro de Investigação em Psicologia para o Desenvolvimento, Instituto de Psicologia e Ciências da Educação, Universidade Lusíada Porto, 4100-346 Porto, Portugal.

Diana AlvesCentro de Psicologia da Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Psicologia e Ciências da Educação da, Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2580-1341

Irene CadimeCentro de Investigação em Psicologia, Escola de Psicologia, Universidade do Minho, 4704-553 Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8285-4824

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/04375/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/PSI/01662/2020

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is important to identify children who are struggling with emergent literacy skills as early as possible to provide them with the support they need to prevent future academic failure. Screening tools administered in groups are more cost-effective than those administered individually, but few are available in Portugal. The goal of this study was to explore the psychometric properties (difficulty, reliability, and validity) of a group emergent literacy screening test for Portuguese-speaking children. The test includes two phonological awareness tasks, one vocabulary task, and one concepts of print task. The sample comprised 1379 children from pre-K (

Indexed as

emergent literacyRasch modelreliabilityscreening toolvalidity

Identifiers

PMID36832435

DOI10.3390/children10020306

PMCPMC9955426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.