Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36832279›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Ultrasound Control of Cervical Regeneration after Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone: Results of an Innovative Measurement Technique.

Vincenzo Pinto, Miriam Dellino, Carla Mariaflavia Santarsiero, Gennaro Cormio, Vera Loizzi, Valentina Griseta, Antonella Vimercati, Gerardo Cazzato, Eliano Cascardi, Ettore Cicinelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of large-loop excision of the transformation zone on cervical morphology: A prospective observational study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vincenzo PintoDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Miriam DellinoDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3522-4648
Carla Mariaflavia SantarsieroDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7193-2858
Gennaro CormioGynecologic Oncology IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5745-372X
Vera LoizziGynecologic Oncology IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4006-6421
Valentina GrisetaDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5736-9170
Antonella VimercatiDepartment of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9862-1619
Gerardo CazzatoSection of Molecular Pathology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian, Area (DiMePRe-J), School of Medicine, Aldo Moro University of Bari, 70100 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0325-4316
Eliano CascardiDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1287-4285
Ettore CicinelliDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2390-4582
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITIstituto Tumori Bari · ITCandiolo Cancer Institute · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this research is to evaluate cervical regeneration after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) through the identification of a new sonographic reference point at the level of the uterine margins. In the period March 2021-January 2022, a total of 42 patients affected by CIN 2-3 were treated with LLETZ at the University Hospital of Bari (Italy). Before performing LLETZ, cervical length and volume were measured with trans-vaginal 3D ultrasound. From the multiplanar images, the cervical volume was obtained using the Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL™) program with manual contour mode. The line that connects the points where the common trunk of the uterine arteries reaches the uterus splitting into the ascending major branch and the cervical branch was considered as the upper limit of the cervical canal. From the acquired 3D volume, the length and the volume of the cervix were measured between this line and the external uterine os. Immediately after LLETZ, the removed cone was measured using Vernier's caliper, and before fixation in formalin, the volume of the excised tissue was evaluated by the fluid displacement technique based on the Archimedes principle. The proportion of excised cervical volume was 25.50 ± 17.43%. The volume and the height of the excised cone were 1.61 ± 0.82 mL and 9.65 ± 2.49 mm corresponding to 14.74 ± 11.91% and 36.26 ± 15.49% of baseline values, respectively. The volume and length of the residual cervix were also assessed using 3D ultrasound up to the sixth month after excision. At 6 weeks, about 50% of cases reported an unchanged or lower cervical volume compared to the baseline pre-LLETZ values. The average percentage of volume regeneration in examined patients was equal to 9.77 ± 55.33%. In the same period, the cervical length regeneration rate was 69.41 ± 14.8%. Three months after LLETZ, a volume regeneration rate of 41.36 ± 28.31% was found. For the length, an average regeneration rate of 82.48 ± 15.25% was calculated. Finally, at 6 months, the percentage of regeneration of the excised volume was 90.99 ± 34.91%. The regrowth percentage of the cervical length was 91.07 ± 8.03%. The cervix measurement technique that we have proposed has the advantage of identifying an unequivocal reference point in 3D cervical measurement. Ultrasound 3D evaluation could be useful in the clinical practice to evaluate the cervical tissue deficit and express the "potential of cervical regeneration" as well as provide the surgeon useful information about the cervical length.

Indexed as

3D ultrasoundcervical intraepithelial neoplasiacervical regenerationlarge loop excision of the transformation zoneLEEPLLETZ

Identifiers

PMID36832279
PMCPMC9955376
OpenAlexW4321372263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.