Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36832254›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Procedural Software Toolkit in the Armamentarium of Interventional Therapies: A Review of Additive Usefulness and Current Evidence.

Abdulaziz M Al-Sharydah, Faisal Khalid BinShaiq, Rayan Ibrahim Aloraifi, Abdulrahman Abdulaziz Almefleh, Saud Abdulaziz Alessa, Adi Saud Alobud, Abdulmonem Mohammed AlSharidah, Abdulmajeed Bin Dahmash, Mohammad S Al-Aftan, Bander Fuhaid Al-Dhaferi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdulaziz M Al-SharydahDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, AlKhobar City 36277, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6590-5850
Faisal Khalid BinShaiqCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 14611, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Rayan Ibrahim AloraifiCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 14611, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman Abdulaziz AlmeflehCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 14611, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Saud Abdulaziz AlessaCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 14611, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Adi Saud AlobudCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 14611, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulmonem Mohammed AlSharidahCollege of Medicine, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, AlKhobar City 36277, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulmajeed Bin DahmashAd Diriyah Hospital, Ministry of Health, Riyadh 13717, Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad S Al-AftanDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, AlKhobar City 36277, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.
Bander Fuhaid Al-DhaferiDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, AlKhobar City 36277, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventional radiology is a fast-paced specialty that uses many advanced and emerging technological solutions. Several procedural hardware and software products are available commercially. Image-guided procedural software helps save time and effort in interventionist practice and adds precision to the intraoperative decisions made by the end user. Interventional radiologists, including interventional oncologists, have access to a wide range of commercially available procedural software that can be integrated into their workflow. However, the resources and real-world evidence related to such software are limited. Thus, we performed a detailed review of the current resources available, such as software-related publications, vendors' multimedia materials (e.g., user guides), and each software's functions and features, to compile a resource for interventional therapies. We also reviewed previous studies that have verified the use of such software in angiographic suites. Procedural software products will continue to increase in number and usage; these will likely be advanced further with deep learning, artificial intelligence, and new add-ins. Therefore, classifying procedural product software can improve our understanding of these entities. This review significantly contributes to the existing literature because it highlights the lack of studies on procedural product software.

Indexed as

embolizationimaging guidanceinterventional radiologyoncologytargeting materialsthermal ablation

Identifiers

PMID36832254
PMCPMC9955934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.